Gergely Csatari to figure out if we can set up a meeting in a way that all joining participants are initally muted
Trevor Bramwell to check how difficult is to move pr-s, issues, branches and projects from GitHub to GitLab?
Trevor Bramwell clarify the migration plan
Trevor Bramwell clarify how can we adopt the current user roles of the CNTT repo to GitLab

Organisation topics

Technical topics

Presentation (A: Trevor Bramwell to add)
As a service GitLab from gitlab.com
All the benefits mentioned in the presentation are for code development while the Specification projects are producing documents in GitHub
- Do we know the benefits of documenting in GitLab compared to doing it in GitHub
  - At least we do not loose benefits
  - GitLab also have inline editing features
  - Trevor Bramwell to check how difficult is to move pr-s issues and projects?
- We must avoid lengthy migration what blocks the work on the Specification projects
Pilot should contain one of the specification streams
Let's have only some testing in the begining
- First only copy CNTT repo to GitLab and not delete from GitHub
The aim of the migration is not only to space IT resource by shutting down Gerrit instances, but also to harmonize the ways of working Anuket wide
Projects under GitLab OPNFV-poc can be easily moved to the official OPNFV GitLab space
We should use https://gitlab.com/groups/anuket/
What is our approach to the issue trackers and wiki built to GitLab versus Jira or Confluence
- It is up to the community to decide
StorePerf and KubeRef are happy with the platform