Versions Compared

Old Version 6

changes.mady.by.user Jim Baker

Saved on

compared with

New Version 7

changes.mady.by.user Former user (Deleted)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents

...

TimeItemPresenterNotes
5 min

Meeting Logistics

Former user (Deleted)
5 min

Announcements

Former user (Deleted)

RI-2 workstream proposing a project in OPNFV. Next steps: proposal (link shown to the L), open comment period, vote at TSC  

10 min

OPNFV Release Process

  •  Status up and any follow up discussion
    • Vote & Poll: TSC Approval of the 2020 Release Plan - Vote/Poll Link
    • Marketing messages process updates from last weeks discussion
    • Using Release meeting time slot to discuss the Release PROCESS - key stakeholders should join

David McBride


10 min

CNTT Engagement status updates

  •  CNTT Future Mode of Operation - deadline is September, in time to make a recommendation to the Governance Board.

Jim Baker Scot Steele

Scot Steele to provide feedback from LFN GB meeting

10 min

CNTT Engagement  – Future Work Items

  •  OPNFV 2.0 Actions: Work Progress Page and Agreements Capture Page
    • CNTT in OPNFV status update - Qiao Fu
    • Do we still need this TSC agenda item?
  •  

    TSC Review of Staffing Proposal to CNTT plus Field Trial Testing Plan and Staffing

    • CNTT discussions? other updates??
    • Do we still need this TSC agenda item?
  •  Reference Infrastructure and Reference Conformance work with CNTT
    • Beyond CNTT's Terms of Reference (Scope), license issue is not a big risk for the amount of code in CNTT docs.
    • Do we still need this TSC agenda item?
  •  Review OPNFV's overall process to respond to CNTT Requirements
    • CNTT Requirements have been revised - Release was
    • Need revised assessment of Requirements Review (CIRV coverage status (April 24))
    • Do we still need this TSC agenda item?
  •  

    CIRV Mandate Review

    • Mark Beierl has looked at the Common Infrastructure Realization & Validation (CIRV) Home page and its mandate and believes that there is a disconnect between what the project started out doing and what it is currently doing.
    • TSC agreed there is as an opportunity to improve  
    • On Weekly Tech Discussion Agenda
    • Status update on this agenda topic

Former user (Deleted)
Jim Baker

  • OPNFV 2.0 on hold during CNTT FMO discussion
  • No update on staffing proposal
  • Field test - Orange is doing test (is good)
  • RI/RC conformance - no update
  • CNTT Requirements - engagement based on test cases
  • CIRV mandate review - can drop?
    • Yes, there does not appear to be any interest in CIRV so we can remove this from the agenda.


2 min

OVP Engagement status update

  •  Discuss current status - how is this impacting OPNFV?
Jim Baker
2 min

OPNFV Project Reviews

  •  Projects:
    • ovn4nvf at future meeting

Jim Baker


10 min

Status Updates

Former user (Deleted)
Jim Baker
Trevor Bramwell



5 min

Future Topics

  •  Future Topic: new template for staffing task & requirement evaluation - similar to Intern projects Mark Beierl
  •  Future Topic: Yardstick's future??  HA test cases.  Bottlenecks' Stress test spawns VMs till it breaks in OVP
  •  Future topic: XTesting as a project - graduation or formalization of it. We don't want it to be similar to the Test DB where we lost maintainers

  • new template concept is on hold while release process is being discussed

...

  • Election
    • Single chair nomination, election will proceed.  Jim Bakerwill start the election
  • New project proposal
    • Call for interested parties to participate, enter name into proposal draft wiki page
    • Will be discussed further in the vDTF

OPNFV Release Process

  • Lots of discussion, no notes captured.

...