Versions Compared

Old Version 18

changes.mady.by.user Saad Ullah Sheikh

Saved on

compared with

New Version 19

changes.mady.by.user Walter.kozlowski

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

    • Agenda 
      • Agenda bashing

      • Anuket Kali release milestones (proposed): 

        MilestoneDescriptionDateNotes
        M0Start of release

         


        M1Release planning

         


        M2Scope Freeze

         


        M3Content Freeze

         


        M4Proofreading

         


        M5Release Readiness

         


        M6Release

         




      • Updates from Work Groups
        • WG1 XGVela collaboration: Pankaj:  Survey internally finalised; transferred to survey monkey by LNF, Joint Anuket and XGVELA PaaS Survey
        • WG2 Acceleration: Petar: Hardware Acceleration Abstraction
        • WG3 Storage: Beth: Beth Cohenlooking for a co-host of this work group; Any contents for Kali release? Waiting for volunteers to join, Issue #2056 now in Backlog
        • WG4 K8s multi-networking and load balancing: Per: presentation to RM on "Network semantics" on Feb 24 (25 minutes); In 3 weeks another presentation on K8s Networking (March 24), discussion on how to incorporate into RM and RA-2 to be continued in thenext RM meeting; Per Andersson to add wiki with the slides
        • WG5 ORAN collaboration: Tomas: Sukhdev, Pankaj, Karine, Toshi, Tom, Arkady and optional Walter,  meeting was held, next step: improving documentation in slide pack for the review in this group and bring it to RM; Collaboration with ORAN to be  continued, but no specific content is expected for Kali
      • Use Case review

        Review RM Issues for closure or next release (date of the next release to be defined)

        Issue No

        Status

        Description

        Assignee

        Discussion

        1876New

        [RM] Add new requirement to address networking scale

        Sukhdev Kapur

        Address scale for multi-site networking:

        Pankaj.Goyal: discussed in RA-1, Riccardo Gasparetto: not currently in RA-2, orchestration issues

        Sukhdev Kapur please document the ask, PR as a gap to Chapter 10

        2056Backlog

        [RM Ch03, Ch04 & Ch05] Storage: enhance content #2056

        Petar Torre (Deactivated) Karine Sevilla

        Walter.kozlowski: Proposal: reassign to WG3 and to Beth Cohen. RM needs a plan what WG3 can deliver for the Anuket "K release (June 2021); after that we can replace this Issue by more specific issues and close 2056

        2068New

        [RM Ch2] Review analysis and whether the documented cloud infrastructure profiles need modifying/adding to

        None

        Walter.kozlowski: similar in a sense to 2067, raised by Tom Kivlin, who moved on form his RA-2 role.  Proposal: discuss with RA-1 Pankaj.Goyal and RA-2 Riccardo Gasparetto to request what they need from RM in this area.  If any action needed, replace 2068 by specific Issues/PRs, otherwise CLOSE.

        Riccardo Gasparetto : authored a proposal for discussion: PR 2312

        2087New

        [RM Chxx] Automation (closed loop automation)

        Tomas Fredberg [Ericsson] Walter.kozlowski

        Walter.kozlowski: the issue raised by Walter.kozlowskito discuss at RM.  Proposal: put this as an agenda item for RM meeting, identify what is needed and what cna be done for "K" release, and then replace 2087 by specific Issues, and then CLOSE generic 2087

        2135New

        [RM Ch03] Illogical sub chapter order

        Tomas Fredberg [Ericsson] Walter.kozlowski

        Walter.kozlowski: there seems to be an agreement how to reorder, any additional comments please do in https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/2135. Proposal: Walter.kozlowski and Tomas Fredberg [Ericsson] split up work between them, raise PRs and start working on them

        2265New

        [RM] Need a profile or flavor for memory intensive applications

        None

        Walter.kozlowski: there seem to be an agreement between Pankaj.Goyal, Beth CohenKarine SevillaRodrigues, João (Nokia)

        on what needs to be done but it is unclear what needs to be done in RM vs RA-1 and RA-2. Proposal: identify actions in RM meeting and re-edit this Issue for RM (alternatively close if no action on RM) and/or add issues on RA- 1 and RA-2.

        PR #2312 created by Riccardo Gasparettoto 2265, 2068 for review

        2276New

        [RM Ch03] Update Service Function Chaining 3.5.1

        kumar.suman

        Walter.kozlowski : this is really new issue (raised 3 days ago and it is currently under review. Agreed: kumar.suman, PR# 2309

        Any new issues to be raised in relation to the work currently planned or in progress in work groups, or otherwise? Please add to the table above.

      • Actions:

    • All: Provide input into Issue discussion in above table
    • Walter.kozlowski include Use Case review into the next RM Meeting, Proposed to defer to the next RM meeting on 24 March 2021
    • All: Review/comment, take ownership of security related Issues: 2313, 2314, 2315, 2316, 2317, 2318
    • All: Review/comment/input into PaaS survey proposal: Joint Anuket and XGVELA PaaS Survey
      • Walter.kozlowski  add milestones for Kali
      • , to be continued in Issue #2067, and subsequent PRs

      • Review RM related Issues and PRs in github for Kali release, to be continued in all subsequent RM meetings until Kali

        Actions:

...