- Testing working group, Functest, yardstick
- Test cases are from testing projects, documents aligned, regular meetings with WG
- Updates to C&C committee, and discussions in the mailing list
- Black box vs. white box discussion
Preliminary discussions on - Need to determine the test area for dovetail.
- Need to determine the test type for dovetail, and identify whether the test type in current
testing projects is complete enough. - Need to get feedback from testing working group on whether current test cases in testing
projects are complete enough to satisfy dovetail's requirements. - Need to determine where test cases are tracked, Jira, wiki or git.
- Need to identify what we use to document the test lists, e.g. the list of cases in the file in git,
wiki, or some database etc. - Need a checklist which can be used to independently verify if proposed test cases satisfy the
minimum criteria for being added to the dovetail test suite, based on the test case requirement
wiki, which need to be agreed on (that page is still a draft). - Need to get feedback about the test report proposal for dovetail.
- Need to get feedback about whether the test case templates are documented well, from
testing working group and dovetail committee. - Need to get feedback about how dovetail committee cooperate with testing working group,
and each feature project committee to establish a plan for how we will test features in OPNFV,
from C&C committee and each related project's committee. - Need to discuss OPNFV architecture tie-in, Models, and MANO on VNF portability.
- Need PODs from Infra working group
- CI/CD, pharos spec, evolution in Danube
Release management discussion with LF staff- to run dovetail tests on OPNFV Colorado.
- Need to provide a dovetail release plan before OPNFV Danube release.
- Need to discuss with Linux Foundation staff how dovetail will do release and how dovetail release
will be managed .
{"serverDuration": 334, "requestCorrelationId": "01bf6ee2c3f64889819f4bdd8d1ed791"}