Versions Compared

Old Version 32

changes.mady.by.user Walter.kozlowski

Saved on

compared with

New Version 33

changes.mady.by.user Cédric Ollivier

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees 

  1. Al Morton  (AT&T)
  2. Frank Brockners (Cisco)
  3. Georg Kunz (Ericsson)
  4. Gergely Csatari (Nokia)
  5. Walter.kozlowski (Telstra)
  6. Cédric Ollivier (Orange)
  7. Trevor Cooper (Intel)
  8. Sridhar Rao  (Spirent)
  9. Lincoln Lavoie  (UNH-IOL)
  10. jie niu (China Mobile representing Qiao Fu)
  11. Riccardo Gasparetto (Vodafone)
  12. Emma Foley (Red Hat)

...

  1.  Scot Steele(AT&T)
  2. Pankaj.Goyal (AT&T)
  3. Amar Kapadia(Aarna Networks)
  4. Ulrich Kleber(Huawei)
  5. James Gu


Agenda

TimeTopicPresentersMinutes
5 min

Meeting Administration

Al Morton
  • Last week's minutes are APPROVED.
5 min

Announcements

Al Morton


10 min

Al Morton

Amar Kapadia

View file
name5G Super Blueprint Presentation 04 13 21.pptx
height250

Group was formed following the observation that a lot of the components for a 5G solution are already available across projects in LF. The project sits under LFN (evolution of the VCO demo).
There'll be two instances of Kuberef - one for ONAP, one for magma.

See also: https://www.lfnetworking.org/5g-super-blueprint/

Cédric Ollivier It shouldn't be limited to the e2e service deployment. It's also about testing, automating all tasks (what about the fork done by LFE?) and to allow the end users to run the same demo locally.

?? min
  •  Update on Marketing efforts
    •  "Getting Started" materials
    •  Extending the Ambassador Program (both telcos and vendors)
B-TEAM!no updates (none of the team members attended the TSC meeting) Nothing to report -- Beth who is monitoring the meeting remotely
10 min
  •  Continue Release process discussions, Goals and Management
  • Last Friday:
    • Resolved Gergely's comments
    • Began working on process steps for M1 criteria
  • Meeting CANCELED for Fri, April 16 (David OOO for the week)
    • Resume April 23
David McBride

CVC would like to request the M4 milestone include a go/no-go decision on badges for the requirements and testing contained in the release.  This decision should address both technical accuracy and if the requirements set meets to end-user needs.  - Lincoln Lavoie

Questions that CVC asks the Anuket TSC to answer as part of M4 (these questions are to help qualify whether the CVC could go ahead and "market" a release):

  1. Are the test cases sufficiently well-implemented to cover RA/RM? RC

2. Do the requirements meet the end-user needs? (operators must answer this)

Cédric Ollivier EUG seems a better place if we want to evaluate the marketing value for a new badge.


10 min
  •  Update on Weekly Technical Discussion of the Charter
    •  Charter Ready for Review by Legal
    •  Operation procedures and Guidelines

Gergely Csatari


10 min
  •  CLA – DCO Discussion
    •  TSC DECISION: Does the TSC agree to use CLA in addition to the DCO?
Steve Winslow
10 min
WS Leads and PTLs


5 min
  •  

    Status Updates

    •  Linux Foundation Lab (Portland) hardware upgrade status
    •  LF IT/Infra update: (Aric Gardner, Trevor Bramwell)

Trevor Bramwell

@ Aric Gardner


5 min


0 min
  •  AOB



Future Agenda Topics:

  •  How do we figure out who are the WS stream leads AND PTLs in an automated way? Mark Beierl


...