Attendees
...
| Time | Topic | Presenters | Minutes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 min | Meeting Administration
| Al Morton |
| ||||||
| 5 min | Announcements
| ||||||||
| 10 min |
| Amar Kapadia |
Group was formed following the observation that a lot of the components for a 5G solution are already available across projects in LF. The project sits under LFN (evolution of the VCO demo). Cédric Ollivier It shouldn't be limited to the e2e service deployment. It's also about testing, automating all tasks (what about the fork done by LFE?) and to allow the end users to run the same demo locally. | ||||||
| ?? min |
| B-TEAM! | no updates (none of the team members attended the TSC meeting) Nothing to report -- Beth who is monitoring the meeting remotely | ||||||
| 10 min |
| David McBride | CVC would like to request that at the time of the M4 milestone a go/no-go decision on badges for the requirements and testing contained be done for the release. This decision should address both technical accuracy and if the requirements set meets to end-user needs. - Lincoln Lavoie Questions that CVC asks the Anuket TSC to answer as part of M4 (these questions are to help qualify whether the CVC could go ahead and "market" a release). These questions are to help CVC gating process - they are not intended to gate anything on the Anuket release process:
Cédric Ollivier EUG seems a better place if we want to evaluate the marketing value for a new badge. It's a CVC milestone or TSC rendez-vous, unlinked to the project release. | ||||||
| 10 min |
| ||||||||
| 10 min |
| Steve Winslow | |||||||
| 10 min |
| WS Leads and PTLs | |||||||
| 5 min |
| @ Aric Gardner | |||||||
| 5 min |
| ||||||||
| 0 min |
| ||||||||
Future Agenda Topics:
|
...