# | Item | Description | Approved Process | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
PR WS Scope | PR affecting multiple Work Stream (WS) |
| If allowed under exceptional cases, who decides, who approves (all WSLs affected by PR?) Gergely Csatari : We discussed that the pr should be approved by the sub-project lead of all affected sub-projects. | |
PR CH Scope | PR affecting multiple chapters |
| Gergely Csatari : I think this should not be a problem to allow. | |
PR Topic Scope | PR affecting multiple disjointed topics |
| Gergely Csatari : I think this should not be a problem to allow. | |
PR Comment Resolution | Who is authorised to "resolve" a comment |
| What is the period of unresponsiveness? Gergely Csatari : According to CONTRIBUTING.md: "Comments/sub-Conversations within a PR may only be marked Resolved by:
| |
PR Change Resolution |
| Gergely Csatari : Should not matter who is making corrections until the corrections are done. | ||
Minimum duration a PR needs to be open for maximising input after changes complete |
| Or should it be Minor 1 week, all others at least 2 weeks? Gergely Csatari: There is a 2 days cool off period mandated by the current CONTRIBUTING.md I do not see a reason to change it. | ||
PR Re-Approvals | Ignore approvals made prior to non-typo changes |
| Gergely Csatari: Arent't these automatically cleared after a new commit is pushed? | |
PR Merge – non WSL author |
| |||
PR Merge – WSL author |
| Final Additional Reviewer to comment that they are OK with the PR being merged. They would have verified that the above agreed-to processes have all been observed. |
Page Comparison
General
Content
Integrations
App links