Versions Compared

Old Version 15

changes.mady.by.user Emma Foley

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user David McBride

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

 

Attendees 

  1. Al Morton (AT&T)
  2. Gergely Csatari (Nokia)
  3. Emma Foley (Red Hat)
  4. @Emma Foley (Proxy for Mark Beierl)
  5. Sridhar Rao  (Spirent)
  6. Trevor Cooper (Intel)
  7. Walter.kozlowski (Telstra)
  8. Riccardo Gasparetto (Vodafone)
  9. Georg Kunz (Ericsson)
  10. Beth Cohen (Verizon)
  11. Lincoln Lavoie  (UNH-IOL)

Absent (TSC)

  1. Frank Brockners (Cisco)
  2. Lincoln Lavoie  (UNH-IOL)
  3. Qiao Fu (China Mobile)
  4. Cédric Ollivier (Orange)
  5. Ahmed El Sawaf (STC)

...

  1.  Jim Baker
  2. Scot Steele
  3. Pierre Lynch [Keysight]
  4. Ildiko
  5. jie niu
  6. Pankaj.Goyal (AT&T)
  7. Ulrich Kleber
  8. David McBride
  9. Rihab Banday
  10. James Gu
  11. Trevor Bramwell
  12. Toshi Wakayama (KDDI)
  13. Karine Sevilla
  14. William DIEGO (Orange)


Agenda

TimeTopicPresentersNotes
5 min

Meeting Administration

  •  Linux Foundation Anti-trust Policy
  •  Agenda Bashing
  •  Attendance/Quorum (10/15)
  •  Approval of previous meeting minutes (March 9)

Al Morton

Quorum achieved, meeting recording in progress

Minutes approved

5 min

Announcements

  •  LFN Governing Board Committer Representative Nomination Period open until   Nominations (including Self-Nominations).
  •  SPC - Proposed Enterprise End User group - Trevor Cooper

Al Morton

Release naming poll results:

  • "Kali" approved for "K"
  • "Lakelse" approved for "L"  

EasyCLA: Each company/org will need to identify individuals for two roles (could be the same person):

  • Sign the IPR agreement (suggest VP or higher)
  • CLA manager - maintains access list via the EasyCLA tool

SPC: Trevor Cooper reports that the EUAG has decided to propose an Enterprise EUAG to the BoD.  Trevor requests that anyone who has questions or suggestions to contact him.

15 min
  •  End User Advisory Group (EUAG)
  • the EUAG mission is clearly evolving from a support group for ONAP to something else.  Should the EUAG and Anuket be better aligned?

Beth Cohen

Jim Baker reports that the charter is being updated to accommodate two EUA groups:  Telco EUAG and Enterprise EUAG

Beth Cohen reports:

  • EUAG seeking better alignment with Anuket
  • EUAG is publishing two white papers:
    • NFV Testing and Automation
      • Workload and Infrastructure
      • Not many standards? Not fully baked -
      • Anuket is well-positioned - focus on infrastructure
    • State of AI and ML in the Industry Survey
      • 65 respondents - first look
      • Anuket focus on  AI/ML related infrastructure and testing
    • Anuket folks can participate
    • What is the TSC appetite for writing WP?
  • Bifurcation of the community - interest in sharing research or opportunity to share user requirements.
10 minDavid McBride

Monday feedback - many comments, upstream version set in M1 ?

Related Anuket Weekly Meeting minutes: Anuket Weekly Technical Discussions - 2021.03.15#Releasemilestones(M1)-Releaseplanning-,

Poll for best meeting time ACTION: David McBride

10 min
  •  Eligibility Community voting - short-term solution
    •  Tools MUST be repeatable, and available to all.  Gap is Marketing.
    •  We have the fields we have, (our tool vendor sets limitations)
    •  AND we can have an exception process:
      •  Sub-threshold participants: appeal to your friendly WS or TSC Member.
    •  Review affiliation data how-to

Jim Baker

Al Morton

Jim Baker  demoed the Insight tool

Georg Kunz Reviewing part of GitHub is not well represented, Jim said that this is a feature for future , in next rounds of voting.

When is the review phase?

https://insights.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/projects/lfn%2Fanuket/active-contributor?time=%7B%22from%22:%222020-03-02T08:00:00.000Z%22,%22type%22:%22absolute%22,%22to%22:%222021-03-02T08:00:00.000Z%22%7D

10 min
  •  Update on Weekly Technical Discussion of the Charter

Gergely Csatari

No time at meeting, three docs proposed by Pankaj, now in three comment pages available.

Please comment the documents with inline comments here:

10 min
  •  Workstream Leads/ Project PTLs standup
    •  RI-2 leadership gap Rihab Banday offered possible ways forward:
      • Combine the RI2 project with the Kuberef project, given the fact that we have very limited resources.
      • Keep the RI2 project as an umbrella project for different implementation flavours like Kuberef, Airship and distribute the tasks - this comes with an additional overhead of multiple meetings, etc. And again we have limited resources.
    •  Pod resources, refreshes, Redfish(es), other HW topics.
Al Morton

Rihab Banday provided a summary - not many participants, little interest in leading

Proposal: Alternate between  Kuberef and Airship Installer (Airship  meets bi-weekly). There will be Co-leads.

Proposal adopted.

RI-2 has been an implementation of cookbook  based on RA-2 , need to coordinate  across the projects - would like to try this.  Does it make sense  based on RI-1 ??

Both projects need to make sure that their specifica are represented in the documentation.

Pod resources in active discussion now. 2021 budget utilization recommendations need discussion (hardware).

5 min
  •  

    Status Updates

    •  Linux Foundation Lab (Portland) hardware upgrade status
    •  LF IT/Infra update: (Aric Gardner, Trevor Bramwell)

Trevor Bramwell

@ Aric Gardner

  • No pending IT updates
  • Trevor Bramwell starting a conversation this week with the associated parties around possibly moving resources Mid-Late April.
5 min
  •  Technical Officers updates

Milestone alignment with GSMA NG (Networking Group) Walter.kozlowski


0 min
  •  AOB



Future Agenda Topics:

  •  How do we figure out who are the WS stream leads AND PTLs in an automated way? Mark Beierl


...