Versions Compared

Version Old Version 2 New Version Current
Changes made by

Walter.kozlowski

Emma Foley

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

16  

Attendees 

  1. Walter.kozlowski (Telstra)
  2. Al Morton (AT&T)Gergely Csatari (Nokia)
  3. Emma Foley (Red Hat)
  4. @Emma Foley (Proxy for Mark Beierl)
  5. Sridhar RaoRiccardo Gasparetto (SpirentVodafone)
  6. Trevor CooperCédric Ollivier (IntelOrange)
  7. Walter.kozlowskiGeorg Kunz (TelstraEricsson)
  8. Riccardo GasparettoSridhar Rao  (VodafoneSpirent)
  9. Georg KunzTrevor Cooper (EricssonIntel)
  10. Beth Cohen (Verizon)
  11. Lincoln LavoieGergely Csatari (UNH-IOLNokia)

Absent (TSC)

  1. Frank Brockners (Cisco)
  2. Qiao Fu (China Mobile)
  3. Cédric OllivierAhmed El Sawaf (OrangeSTC)Ahmed El Sawaf
  4. Lincoln Lavoie  (STCUNH-IOL)

Other Attendees 

  1.  

Agenda

...

Time

...

Topic

...

Presenters

...

Notes

  1. Scot Steele(AT&T)
  2. Pankaj.Goyal (AT&T)
  3. Ulrich Kleber(Huawei)


Agenda

Time

Topic

Presenters

Notes

5 min

Meeting Administration

  •  Linux Foundation Anti-trust Policy
  •  Agenda Bashing
  •  Attendance/Quorum (
10
  • _?)/15)
  •  Approval of previous meeting minutes (March 9)

Al Morton

Quorum achieved, meeting recording in progress

Walter.kozlowski

Jim Baker

Minutes approved

5 min

Announcements

  •  LFN Governing Board Committer Representative Nomination Period open until   Nominations (including Self-Nominations).
  •  
SPC - Proposed Enterprise End User group - Trevor Cooper

Al Morton

Release naming poll results:

  • "Kali" approved for "K"
  • "Lakelse" approved for "L"  

EasyCLA: Each company/org will need to identify individuals for two roles (could be the same person):

  • Sign the IPR agreement (suggest VP or higher)
  • CLA manager - maintains access list via the EasyCLA tool

SPC: Trevor Cooper reports that the EUAG has decided to propose an Enterprise EUAG to the BoD.  Trevor requests that anyone who has questions or suggestions to contact him.

15 min
  •  End User Advisory Group (EUAG)
  • the EUAG mission is clearly evolving from a support group for ONAP to something else.  Should the EUAG and Anuket be better aligned?

Beth Cohen

Jim Baker reports that the charter is being updated to accommodate two EUA groups:  Telco EUAG and Enterprise EUAG

Beth Cohen reports:

  • EUAG seeking better alignment with Anuket
  • EUAG is publishing two white papers:
    • NFV Testing and Automation
      • Workload and Infrastructure
      • Not many standards? Not fully baked -
      • Anuket is well-positioned - focus on infrastructure
    • State of AI and ML in the Industry Survey
      • 65 respondents - first look
      • Anuket focus on  AI/ML related infrastructure and testing
    • Anuket folks can participate
    • What is the TSC appetite for writing WP?
    • Bifurcation of the community - interest in sharing research or opportunity to share user requirements.
    • Intern program proposals (see Casey Cain's message to TSC, March 17)

    Al Morton

    Walter.kozlowski


    10 min
    •  Continue Release process discussions,
    Goals and Management
    • Kali release milestones
    wiki
    anuket
    io
    QD1DPoll for best meeting time ACTION: David McBride
      • W_hNAQ)  UPDATE
      •  Readout from the Monday Tech Discussion meeting.
    David McBride

    Monday feedback - many comments, upstream version set in M1 ?

    Related Anuket Weekly Meeting minutes: Anuket Weekly Technical Discussions - 2021.03.15#Releasemilestones(M1)-Releaseplanning-,

    Top 3 meeting times from survey:

    • Wed, 6 a.m. Pacific
    • Fri, 7 a.m. Pacific
    • Fri, 6 a.m. Pacific
    David McBride

    7 a.m. Pacific for Release Mgmt meeting decided

    Monday Tech Discussion did not discuss release management

    10 min
    •  Eligibility Community voting - short-term solution
      •  Tools MUST be repeatable, and available to all.  Gap is Marketing.
      •  We have the fields we have, (our tool vendor sets limitations)
      •  AND we can have an exception process:
      •  Review
    affiliation data how-to

    Jim Baker

    Al Morton

    Jim Baker  demoed the Insight tool

    Georg Kunz Reviewing part of GitHub is not well represented, Jim said that this is a feature for future , in next rounds of voting.

    When is the review phase?

    Jim Baker


    https://insights.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/projects/lfn%2Fanuket/active-contributor?time=%7B%22from%22:%222020-03-02T08:00:00.000Z%22,%22type%22:%22absolute%22,%22to%22:%222021-03-02T08:00:00.000Z%22%7D

    Riccardo Gasparetto asks for an exception, is a TSC member

    10 min
    •  Anuket Recruiting
    		Bob Monkman (Deactivated)

    Brandon Wick presented: Anuket marketing team trying to raise interest among operators not currently engaged; 6 operators on shortlist, under due diligence; emails expected to be sent this week; kick-off meetings to follow

    A good reference is the 19March2021 Marketing Meeting Minutes wiki page, which also has a link to the Anuket Ambassadors wiki page: Meeting 031921


    Cedric Ollivier raised a question regarding engaging LFN Board for recruitment, left for Heather Kirksey to respond

    10 min
    •  Update on Weekly Technical Discussion of the Charter

    Gergely Csatari

    No time at meeting, three docs proposed by Pankaj, now in three comment pages available.

    Please comment the documents with inline comments here:

    Covered mostly Gergely Csatari comments - actions recorded.


    10 min
    •  RI-2 leadership gap Rihab Banday offered possible ways forward:
      • Combine the RI2 project with the Kuberef project, given the fact that we have very limited resources.
      • Keep the RI2 project as an umbrella project for different implementation flavours like Kuberef, Airship and distribute the tasks - this comes with an additional overhead of multiple meetings, etc. And again we have limited resources.
      •  Pod resources, refreshes, Redfish(es), other HW topics.
      •  RA2 - Cluster LCM ongoing discussion
    •  WSL/PTL updates

    Al Morton

    Rihab Banday provided a summary - not many participants, little interest in leading

    Proposal: Alternate between  Kuberef and Airship Installer (Airship  meets bi-weekly). There will be Co-leads.

    Proposal adopted.

    RI-2 has been an implementation of cookbook  based on RA-2 , need to coordinate  across the projects - would like to try this.  Does it make sense  based on RI-1 ??

    Both projects need to make sure that their specifica are represented in the documentation.

    Pod resources in active discussion now. 2021 budget utilization recommendations need discussion (hardware

    Walter.kozlowski

    WSLs / PTLs

    Trevor Cooperwould like a better picture of what OTHER resources there are, w.r.t. UNH resources and LF resources.  No one wants to give up resources...

    Also, What resources do we really need?  all resources were identical when the pod definition was created, but what do we need now?  Really need a group to look at these questions - more than the process to request hardware - need a better process to allocate resources.

    Cédric Ollivier could use resources if available.

    Also, the budget that was spent in 2020. went to UNH lab.

    Sridhar Rao will help, with assessment of intel pods.

    Cédric Ollivier is CNTT RC-1 Field Trial OVER???  Need to communicate about this, because it will free-up resources if it is over. Mirantis and Orange participated.

    Riccardo Gasparetto RA-2:  whether to include K8s Clusters or not? discussion on-going here

    Walter.kozlowski RM workstream working closely with RA 1 and 2, will be ready for May milestones.

    Pankaj.Goyal RA1 Target is OS TRAIN  (RA can be ahead of RI versions AIRSHIP Installer == Stein)

    Emma Foley Zoom crashed, I would appreciate a TL;DR of the answer to "How do we deal with supporting older versions of OpenStack when we need to test new features?"

    Cédric Ollivier  Decouple RI testing (for VNF)  but RC testing, leverage testing on ANY system that is needed. Functest does this now.  Main challenge is how to deal with all these different releases in Anuket, starting with OS and K8s.  May need 3 or 4 OS releases covered in a single A-release.

    Question about current community interest, limited to Train at present, but there is a spectrum of releases covered by parts of the community (Functest covers 6 OS releases, benchmarking tools can cover many releases because their API does not change much).


    5 min
    •  

      Status Updates

      •  Linux Foundation Lab (Portland) hardware upgrade status
      •  LF IT/Infra update: (Aric Gardner, Trevor Bramwell)

    Trevor Bramwell

    @ Aric Gardner

    No pending IT updates

    Trevor Bramwell

     starting a conversation this week with the associated parties around possibly moving resources Mid-Late April

    no planned infra changes - reached out to OSU partner for transfer, hoping to schedule for end of April. Hoping for 1 day/2 day duration of downtime,. Switches move too, VPN and on-site networking will change.

    5 min
    •  Technical Officers updates
    Milestone alignment with GSMA NG (Networking Group) Walter.kozlowski

    Anuket and XGVela survey development took place, transferring to S-Monkey for implementation (link)


    0 min
    •  AOB
      •  M Release Naming
    		Cédric Ollivier

    Needed for Anuket RC-2, needed in 1 month. Used for the next test case tags


    Future Agenda Topics:

    •  How do we figure out who are the WS stream leads AND PTLs in an automated way? Mark Beierl


    Outstanding Action Items

    •  Need the statement of Business value (focused on the vendor community) from the Marketing WG. Brandon Wick Bob Monkman (Deactivated)
    •  For all PTLs - identify the Lab resources you are currently using!  by  
    •  Anuket Recruiting:  Bob Monkman heads up the Anuket marketing group. We could invite him for a readout in 2-3 weeks from . Bob Monkman (Deactivated) Brandon Wickgave the readout.
    •  Need to do a poll, following a survey for M-release names.  Could choose ALL the names, if that's simpler!


    LFN Governing Board Member Committers Representative (LGBMCR)

    ...