•Any active community member is eligible to be a candidate for a TSC seat. •Only active community members are eligible to vote in a TSC membership election. •Only one (1) active community member from any organisation can vote in any election. Where a company/organisation has multiple active members, then these members shall meet and decide who amongst them shall be eligible to vote and communicate the decision to the person in charge of conducting the election •Eligibility is effective as of the date and time the nomination process starts.
TSC Member election mechanics •The nominations period shall be open for two (2) weeks* •The TSC member elections shall be conducted electronically by LFN staff among the Active Community Members •At least two-thirds of the Active Community Members are required to have voted for a valid election •The elections are held by using electronic voting tool based on the Condorcet method
TSC Composition The Anuket TSC shall consist of fifteen (15) members of which at least seven (7) will represent Telco Operators. • Any changes to the membership shall maintain the 7 to 15 ratio of the minimum number of Telco Operator members to the total number of TSC members. • Only one (1) member per company/organisation o If more than two (2) TSC members would be from the same group of Related Companies, either at the time of election or from a later job change or changes to company ownership, they will jointly decide on the one (1) individual to be the member
Nomination period is 2 weeks as defined in the charter.
Current charter mentions "Only one (1) active community member from any organisation can vote in any election." Several TSC members voiced concerns. Suggestion is to remove the sentence from the charter to ensure proper representation of the contributors.
VOTE: "Does the TSC agree to remove the bullet point beginning: 'Only one (1) active community member from any organisation can vote in any election.' from the charter?".
Vote results: 11 x agree, 0 x abstain, 0 x disagree
Gergely will facilitate the charter change. He'll work with the community coordination committee (Scott & Beth).
Note from Heather: If we take the "past 12 months" for determining active community members, it'll be a mix of "Anuket" (since Jan/2021) and earlier OPNFV/CNTT (until end of 2020) contributions. In case you're a contributor and your contributions might not have been captured (e.g. blogs, whitepapers, ..) by the tools automatically, raise it to the PTL of your project and eventually to the TSC. This is what the Sept-6 - Oct-1 "review of active contributor list" period is for. The number of contributors that will not be captured in the normal process is going to be small. There is already an alternate process for people whose contributions are not otherwise captured through the GitHub and Wiki automated system that is outlined in the Charter.
In case there is no PTL for the effort, contributors can directly contact the TSC (send email to anuket-tsc list).
Proposal to removal MAC rep from the election process. Several reasons for this. This is a very hard to fill role, Discussion of the MAC role pros and cons for including it in the election process. It is not specified either way in the charter. The TSC should take a vote on what to do about the MAC representative role.
The rep to the LFN TAC and SPC can be by default be the chair, but the chair can nominate someone else. Discussion to see if it makes sense to change to be an elected position. Requires that the charter be changed.
According to the Anuket Charter, Anuket TAC representative is a co-chair. Thus TAC representative should be removed from the election. There was a discussion on whether we still want to elect the TAC representative. – This has been handled in the charter, so no need for a vote.
Talked about Anuket and Anuket Assured on the EUAG Meeting. The decision at this time by the EUAG is to shelve joint discussions. The EUAG is currently focused on more research type activities related to AI/ML and not infrastructure at this time.
Request to to (re-)introduce Anuket Assured. either or 31.
No news on Anuket Assured marketing. Will be announcing this at the ONES Summit. Request for a company to spot light a product/service that is certified.
2 min
Feedback from (re-)introduction of Anuket Assured to EUAG