TAC Member Makeup - The group agreed to adopt two of the new proposals for expanding the makeup of the TAC to include the two appointed positions as well as the Gov. Board committer at large. The LFN Platinum membership seats were discussed at length and the general thought / outcome was to not change those seats, but to administratively stop tracking the seats that are not participating. This aligns with the Quorum requirements, which are adopted from the LFN documentation and are a function of participation in the previous two meetings. The LF staffing would also continue to reach out to those members to get the "right" person appointed and participating in the TAC, since that is the end goal.
Release Management - Second larger discussion was on release management, and what requirements should be on projects within LFN. Some projects, like Anuket and ONAP have LF staff leading release management, other projects do not have that level of support or even that same approach to release management. There were no final decisions made on the recommendations or changes. In general, there was an agreement that projects should have some "process" documented and have demonstrated a success in following that process for "a few" releases, and that could be applied towards projects moving up from incubation, but again, no decisions finalized, this will be discussed more at the next meeting. David has slides, which should be attached to the minutes [1] (hopefully).
5 min
Release
work to be completed week of May 16
Impacts may be seen in PRs - Cédric Ollivierhas been resolving these.
I’m at a LF event this week, so I’m unable to join you for the TSC meeting. However, since, Moselle M3 is scheduled this week, I wanted to provide a recommendation on approving the milestone.
As you know, M3 was rescheduled to allow time for VinePerf and RI2 to complete their requirements. Last week, Dan Xu emailed the TSC to let you know that the requirements for RI2 for M3 have been completed.
I believe that VinePerf has completed its requirements, as well, but we still need confirmation from the PTL, Al Morton.
Assuming that Al confirms that the requirements have been met, then I recommend that the TSC approve the milestone. If not, then I recommend that the TSC approve the milestone, with the condition that the remaining open requirements be completed by M4.
Let me know if you have any questions. I’ll return to the TSC meeting next week.
M3 milestone approved. Note that Airship needs to be archived.
GSMA meeting will be on Thursdayneeds Word docs, discussing changing to PDF and updating the processes in general. Need to include tables and diagrams in the docs directly, rather than linking them. Needs to be done on the Anuket side. Some decisions are on the GSMA side.
Docs Project: revamp and develop a consistent place and process to manage documentation. Discuss DTL Session plan
Review of CLA legal text and get sign off from participating companies
In the TSC meeting 26.04.2022 TSC representatives should indicate if they have questions or comments to the proposed CLA text.Feedback from LF on the concerns of TSC member companies to the CLA text
Orange and Nokia provided feedback already to LFN about thier concerns
LF legal did not see the concerns yet
TSC representatives send your concerns to
Working on the CLA with Sandra Jackson (Deactivated). Otherwise the docs component has moved to another taskforce. CCC seems to have done its job and will likely not continue on a regular basis.
From Thoth project. Needed the Julia Language for the Jupiter Notebooks output. Gergely Csatarithinks we should not retain the outputs before submitting the patches. Julia Language is a group of students who worked together. Recommendation is to provide individual contributions individually.
What is Sonic and how is it related to Anuket? Need to look at. Sonic is network OS so makes sense to go under LFN. Where is it currently? LF or LFN? Need to research it.