Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Beth Cohen

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Scot Steele

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees 

  1. Beth Cohen (Verizon, Co-Chair)

Absent (TSC)

  1. Emma Foley (Red Hat)
  2. Lincoln Lavoie  (UNH-IOL)
  3. Trevor Cooper (Intel)
  4. Karine Sevilla(Orange) Lincoln Lavoie  (UNH-IOL)
  5. Scot Steele(Microsoft)
  6. Riccardo Gasparetto (Vodafone)
  7. Al Morton (AT&T)
  8. Gergely Csatari (Nokia, Co-Chair)
  9. Pankaj.Goyal(Microsoft)
  10. Scot Steele(Microsoft)
  11. Al Morton (AT&T)
  12. Georg Kunz (Ericsson)
  13.  Gergely Csatari (Nokia, Co-Chair)
  14. Riccardo Gasparetto (VodafoneWalter.kozlowski(Telstra) (proxy Pankaj.Goyal )

Absent (TSC)

  1. Emma Foley (Red Hat)
  2. Trevor Cooper (Intel)
  3. Karine Sevilla(Orange) 
  4. Georg Kunz (Ericsson)
  5. Ulrich Kleber (Huawei)  
  6. jie niu (China Mobile)
  7. Walter.kozlowski(Telstra)

Other Attendees 


Agenda

Time

Topic

Presenters

Notes

5 min

Beth Cohen

Gergely Csatari adding topic on TAC activities

Minutes approved

Need to review meeting schedule for the end of the year.


2 min
  •  Announcements

2022 Year in Review statement


Beth Cohen


Gergely Csatari put the statement in a wiki for editing by the TSC

Proposed text for the Anuket project statement for LFN 2022 Year in Review

  2 min
  •  Elections

Sandra Jackson (Deactivated)

Co-chair elections going on NOW.  Please vote.

10 min
  •  Next SPC meeting is on  

Discussion of TSC recommendations

Scot Steele 

Discussion of strategic goals for LFN and Anuket specifically, and how we have not delivered on the original goals.  The hyperscalers have become more important in the telecom ecosystem.  Pankaj.Goyal notes a number of operators mention "CNTT conformance" in their specifications.

LFN has been focusing on giga-projects in recent years, might want to work on smaller more focused projects to gain support and be more effective.  There are huge costs related to testing that got lost in the project details.  We need to align the specifications with the testing (test driven development), because the testing is the value add to the operators and vendors.

https://lists.anuket.io/g/anuket-tsc/topic/e_anuket_tsc_soliciting/95357119?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate/sticky,,,20,2,0,95357119,previd%3D1670335203061266281,nextid%3D1668683674135052062&previd=1670335203061266281&nextid=1668683674135052062

Talking points to be shared at the SPC meeting 12/12

  • We haven’t delivered on the commitments from the merger. – See diagram.
  • We lack a clear, agreed upon value proposition that is aligned with the needs of our industry (meaning BOTH operators and suppliers).
  • Operators fail to see compelling reason to specify Anuket in RFPs.
    • To date, we have not demonstrated a fully functional environment based on Anuket
    • How does the Operator benefit from adopting Anuket specifications? – Need to reduce costs and time to market.
    • How does the Supplier benefit from adopting Anuket specifications? Need to reduce costs and time to market.
  • Our Specifications and code are hard to adopt.
    • Define the min skillset of an implementer, then build docs (cookbooks) to that level.


  • We have a conflict between the standards necessary to keep the org healthy, and the desire of technically inclined to work on the technology.
  • We are struggling with how to keep our infrastructure supporting our needs. Rules often prevent regular updates and maintenance to the servers we depend on.
  • We lack the ability to see past our own company’s needs and focus on the outcome for the industry. The ability to trust in each other to work toward the common goal must be part of our DNA.
  • We have differences of opinion regarding the purpose and value of the TSC. (Leadership)
  • Gig-projects have taken over.
  • We aren’t perceived as “cool”.


5 min
  •  Discussion of Nephio and how it relates to Anuket
Gergely Csatari Nephio dicussion postponed to next week.
5 min
  •  Release Updates
    •  Nile Release – Due date Nov 8 2022
    •  Handover of release management role to the community

Scot Steele

Moved the M4 and M5 milestones one week.  M5 is closing on 16 Dec 2022.  Proof reading in progress.  Scot Steele met with David McBride for more handoff processes.  Great progress on RC2!!!  


2 min
  •  Leftovers of the merger
    • Moving of the anuket repo

Gergely Csatari 

postponed to next week.
2 min
  •  Anuket survey
    • Was the Final Survey released at ONE Summit?

Beth Cohen 

  • Sent out 12-5-2022.  Will be in the upcoming newsletter with blurb (Beth Cohen is writing).  Encourage your colleagues to complete the survey.  It takes about 3 minutes.
2 min

Scot Steele

Beth Cohen

  • Still waiting for legal.  Need to follow up to close this item out.
5 min

Gergely Csatari 

Please look at it.  One PR needs to be merged in RC1.  

2 min
  •  Build in cntt-n/CNTT?
    • The automatic build is broken
    • Build before merge to avoid situations like pull/3260
Gergely Csatari Still broken.
2 min

Sub-project Leaders

ViNePerf is moving to UNH LaaS hosting in 2023 - thanks to Lincoln Lavoie for the welcome! 

Intel is shutting down their Community Lab after ~9 years of very gracious hosting - MANY THANKS!

5 min

  • \also be a good addLF Build 6 was down – fixed.
  • Oregon Lab status is unclear
  • OpenInfra summit is in June in Vancouver.   CFP is open until Jan 10.  Please send in proposals.
  • Technical meeting on Wednesday 7 is canceled.
1 minAOB


Minutes

Meeting Administration

...