Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees 

  1. Scot Steele (Co-Chair)
  2. Beth Cohen (Verizon)
  3. Pankaj.Goyal (Microsoft)
  4. Dan Xu  (Huawei)
  5. Walter.kozlowski(Telstra)
  6. Gergely Csatari (Nokia, Co-Chair)
  7. Riccardo Gasparetto 
  8. Lincoln Lavoie 

...


Time

Topic

Presenters

Notes (if you have comments prior to the meeting add them to this column with your name as the source of the comment)

5 min
2 min

Announcements

5 min
  •  Anuket Assured and CNCF CNF Certification collaboration
Gergely Csatari 
  • Beth brought this up in SPC, but the actual discussion did not happen
  • We will cover this in the SPC from now on
5 min
  • No volunteer for RC2 and Release Manager
    • Scot Steele  will do a bit more marketing to get someone interested
  • No volunteer for Thoth PTL
  • Interim election for the TSC seat of Lei Huang
    • Sandra sent a mail about the active contribution list. The charter does not require to create a new list
    • No nominations yet, deadline is  
5 min
Fabio Palumbo (Deactivated) 
5 min
Release Updates
  •  Orinoco - Orinoco Home
    •  M2  
      • VOTE: Scot Steele will send out a vote mail about M2 today (   ) US time
    •  M3  
  • M2
  • M3
    • RC and RI have the biggest contributions
2 min
Beth Cohen 
  • The survey is closing tomorow
  • Beth will report on the results next week
2 min
Sandra Jackson 
  • The tables are not yet combined



2 min
  •  SPC and TAC update
Gergely Csatari , Beth Cohen 
  • SPC
    • LFN is perceived as having a high barrier to projects joining
    • Network projects coming into the LF are created outside of LFN - Nephio good example
    • Should network related projects coming into the LF default to LFN?
    • Discussion of project onboarding into the LFN continued.
      • Are there blockers?
      • Is it Teleco specific?
      • Is it Funding?
      • Should there be overlap between projects?
        • Catherine Lefevre The selection of new projects is important. There should be scrutiny
    • Jonne Soininen If retaining control of the budget is the gating factor, is it better to go back to having an independent budget for each project? 
      • There seems to be some general agreement that budgeting should not be the considering factor for new project induction into LF or LFN but rather the technology alignment.
      • Kenny Paul noted that the original purpose of forming the LFN is because companies did not want to "nickel-and-dimed" for each project, but rather central funding for the Networking projects.
  • Next TAC meeting is tomorrow 10 AM Eastern Time
2 min

Sub-project Leaders

  • No updates
5 min

  • Looking for O-RAN WG6 and Sylva representative
1 minAOB
  • Nope