Page Comparison

•  Linux Foundation Anti-trust Policy
•  TSC Meetings are recorded! The recordings are retained to help fill gaps in the minutes until approval (1 week).
•  Agenda Bashing 
•  Attendance/Quorum (__13/15)
•  Approval of previous meeting minutes 2022-01-25 TSC Agenda and Minutes

Gergely Csatari

Announcements

•  June Developer Event - In-person - Porto, Portugal
  •  June 13-16, 2022
    
•  Meeting with the CNCF
  • Feb 2 16h UTC (Meeting link: Click here to join the meetinginvitation: https://lists.anuket.io/g/anuket-tech-discuss/viewevent?eventid=1405975&calstart=2022-02-02)
•  CNCF is going to sponsor a Telco Cloud Day date May 16th in Valencia Spain.  More info to come.
•  Project Teams Gathering (PTG), happening virtually on April 4-8, registration is now open:

  • https://www.openstack.org/ptg/

  • https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com/

•  OpenInfra Summit June 7-9 Berlin Requests for sessions open until February 9th.
  • https://cfp.openinfra.dev/app/berlin-2022
•  Heather Kirksey: Interim virtual DTF before June

Beth Cohen

• OpenInfra Summit RFC open is until Feb 9
  
  • Add session proposals related to Anuket in here: https://cfp.openinfra.dev/app/berlin-2022
  • In Berlin one week before the June development event in Porto
  • Currently planned to in person only
  • There are Forum sessions planned again
  • There will be the usual session recordings
• PTG
  • All virtual
  • Registration is open here: https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com/
  • Agenda is not available yet
• Interim vitual LFN DTF before June around March
  • Initiated as a feedback discussion in the DTF
  • Most probably a 2 days session
  • TAC is interested in the feedback of the communities
  • Proposal: Discuss big cross community questions based on specific topics, like:
    • CNF workload testing
    • Cloud native onboarding
    • Security
    • Cross community documentation discussion
    • Telco/Vendor collaboration on projects and badging support
  • Add a +1 if you are interested in participating: +1
  • Add your name if you are interested in to be in the programming committee: Beth Cohen Scot Steele , Gergely Csatari
  • Feedback from Cédric Ollivier : having interim events makes the regular meetings more content light and it is difficult to participate in several meetings and releases. There are regular meetings with ONAP about security and documentation.

•  Marketing Update

• Slides available here

Scot Steele

Beth Cohen

Brandon Wick will be on call to give update.

•  Moselle 
  •  M1 - Release Definition 01 Feb 2022 
    
  • Full schedule
  •  Review M1 release management requirements
    • M1 summary sent to mailing list

• • • Moselle Release Progress
    • CIRV not participating in Moselle.  
      • Dependencies? Any impact on the release?
    • Recommendation:  requirements for M1 have been met.  Recommend that the TSC approve M1.
      • Vote text:  Does the TSC agree with the recommendation that the requirements of Moselle M1 have been met?
  •  M2 - March 22

David McBride

• Requirements for M1 were met.
• CRIV is most probably not participating to Moselle
  • Are there any dependencies on CRIV in other projects?
    • Hearing none
    • If yes please inform David McBride
• Vote: Does the TSC agree with the recommendation that the requirements of Moselle M1 have been met?
  • Approval of Moselle M1 with 12 yes votes

Gergely Csatari

RM - https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/pull/2746 - waits for comments or approval from Walter.kozlowski

RA1 - Done

RA2 - Done

RI1 - https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/pull/2777 - waits for review-s

RI2 - Done

RC1 - Done

RC2 - Done

Common, Gov - https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/pull/2737 waits for comments or approval from Pankaj.Goyal and Walter.kozlowski

•  CCC updates
  •  Docs Project: revamp and develop a consistent place and process to manage documentation.

Scot Steele

Beth Cohen

No updates

Pankaj.Goyal

Will need a vote of the TSC

Discussion about the various roles.  Is the TSC leads the right people to be the master admins?  Way too much overhead and more burden.  

Cédric Ollivier If we follow the opensource rules, the most important contributors should be as code owners.

Al Morton I agree with Karine that more than one person should have merger rights. Also, 3 positive reviews should lead to a merger, as the rules seem to state...

To be continued to next week.

• It was discussed over mail that for pr-s affecting more than one sub-project an approval is needed by the lead of all the affected sub-projects.
• We need more than one persons to be able to merge in every case.
• Cooloff time for comments is to short
• After major changes there is a need for re-approvals
• We need 2 codeowners with merging rights for every sub-project, selected by the sub-projects themselves

All of this is described in the CONTRIBUTIONS.md file. Gergely Csatari to create a pr and invite all TSC members for reivew.

•  Review of CLA legal text provided by Sandra Jackson (Deactivated)and David McBride

Gergely Csatari

•  GitLab update 
  
  •  EasyCLA support - Issue appears to be resolved.
  •  Pranab - ready to start on-boarding,
  •  There are still some challenges to moving forward with the conversion to the new tools.  There are some objects to moving.  The decision has been postponed to be revisited in the new year by the new TSC.  Needs more discussion and consideration on how to move forward.

Feb 23, 2021 Minutes

Trevor Bramwell

Will need a vote of the new TSC.  The previous TSC voted to support this effort.

• Let's defer this to the next meeting and prioritize it.

Sub-project Leaders

•  Technical Officer Updates
  
  •  Tech Editor - Beth Cohen
  •  EUAG - Beth Cohen
  •  CNCF Tech Coordination - Gergely Csatari
  •  ETSI NFV and MEC Tech Coordination - Ulrich Kleber
  •  GSMA Tech Coordination - Walter.kozlowski
  •  XGVela Tech Coordination - Pankaj.Goyal
  •  Open Infrastructure Foundation -  Ildiko
  •  ORAN - vacancy for WG 6
    
  •  MEF - MEHMET TOY