Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 13
Next »
Date
Attendees
- Move up from absent as needed.
Absent
Non TSC Attendees
Agenda items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|
| 5 min | | | |
| 5 min | Announcements - Fall Technical Event - Not the same week as ONES!
- Start Oct 13 or 14, run 3 days with less time each day
- Topic Submission Status????
- Volunteers to represent OPNFV in event:
- Lincoln Lavoie and Sridhar Rao will represent us
- Volunteer(s) needed to run the OPNFV Weekly Technical Discussion meetings: ASAP - rotating chairs, see right-hand column
| | |
| 10 min | - Docker image retention policy
- Weekly Tech Discuss IRC minutes
- The rate of Pulls may be the biggest problem,
- collect data for most active projects,
- inform TAC and LF IT to deal with this issue LFN-wide.
| | Tech Discuss meeting |
| 5 min | - TAC Feedback on OPNFV Project Review
| Al Morton |
|
| 5 min | OPNFV Release Process - Status
- Requirements Work Group using the Release meeting time
- THIS WEEK we focus on performance and telemetry requirements
- determine the make-up of the JERMA Release
- Need PTL Participation
- Key conclusions so far, regarding JERMA and CNTT Baldy
- Security requirements being revised (out of JERMA scope)
- Functional tests will refer to CNTT RC-1 for requirements
- Testing in other areas must reach past RC-1 to RA-1 in order to help CNTT stakeholders.
- Documentation: Jerma Requirements Working Group Assessment
- Overhauling OPNFV Docs Sofia Wallin
- Meeting Logistics
- Self-Release Naming: Use of OPNFV Release names in the future.
| | Partial list of issues discussed: - Project Candidates: RI-2 Instantiation, VSPERF, Airship, Prox/SampleVNF, CIRV, would participate in Integration testing, need to talk about others.
- Are the Definitions of Gates clear?
- Testing of the CNTT-selected RC Test Cases
- projects must pass Gating (s 17)
- Gates need to be established, install without errors, simple functional tests, success of more advanced features and automated with X-testing
- Pre-requisites, include Integration TEST project (Morgan in ONAP), test what OPNFV delivers.
- OPNFV needs to Release and Support tests that are reliable.
- "Establish" items are the key steps for TSC: Requirements Vetting and Integration Test SCs
|
| 10 min | CNTT Engagement status updates
| | |
| 10 min | - Need to know requirements for coming year
- Marketing and HW buckets, CAPEX, LF Staffing
- SLIDES !! Like last year, increase or decrease, or just right!
- #agree ???
| | |
| 10 Min | - Recording for the purpose of audio transcript only. (defer to )
| | |
| 5 min | OVP Engagement status update
- Performance testing discussion status update
- RC-2 and OVP 2.0 discussions
- Performance terms adopted in terminology (no acceptance thresholds)
| | - VDTF Session on Performance testing with OVP 2.0 went well
- Representation needed at bi-weekly CVC meeting - see notes page for more info
- current page (same as above?)
- General acceptance at CVC meeting but need to prusue RC-2 adoption of latest text.
|
| 2 min | OPNFV Project Reviews - Projects:
- ovn4nfv at future meeting
| | Trevor Cooper Project code being used in Akraino and another project. PTL not responding. Some interest in moving the repo to Akraino |
| 10 min | Status Updates - OPNFV Linux Foundation Lab (Portland) hardware upgrade status
- LF IT/Infra update: (Aric Gardner, Trevor Bramwell)
| |
|
| 5 min | Future Topics - Future Topic: new template for staffing task & requirement evaluation - similar to Intern projects Mark Beierl
- Future Topic: Yardstick's future?? HA test cases. Bottlenecks' Stress test spawns VMs till it breaks in OVP
|
| - new template concept is on hold
|
Outstanding Action Items
| | |
|
- Start a new round of project reviews
| | |
|
Minutes
IRC Meeting minutes
Action items
