Anuket Project
2020-02-12 - [CNTT - RM Workstream Master] Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Attendees:
Please add your name in here:
@Kelvin Edmison (Nokia)
@Former user (Deleted)
@Pankaj.Goyal (AT&T)
@Al Morton (AT&T)
@Walter.kozlowski (Telstra)
@Karine Sevilla (Orange)
@Tomas Fredberg (Ericsson) (Ericsson)
@Trevor Cooper (Intel)
@Former user (Deleted) (VF)
@Petar Torre (Deactivated) (Intel)
@Former user (Deleted) (ChinaMobile)
@Ahmed El Sawaf (STC)
Special Notes:
Given the limited time available, we will focus on identifying issues/actions/next steps, but not solving them right now
Weekly RM meetings are intended to
Identify owners for new Issues
Track open Issues
Address technical issues that cannot be resolved online (i.e. resolve stalls)
Agenda:
Agenda bashing
Review Baldy release priorities
Call to self-assign work items that are not tagged as backlog
https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues?page=1&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3ARM+-label%3ABacklog
Preferentially tackle these over items that are currently in the backlog
VNF Evolution Strategy https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/1007 sub-issues 1, 3 still open
Discuss sub-issue 1 here: workload scheduling
OpenStack suggests that in many cases Flavours are preferred to scheduler_hints
https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/scheduler-hints-vs-flavor-extra-specs.html
Can we adopt this as the conclusion to sub-issue 1?
Open questions
TBD
New Business
Actions:
General
Document decision (flowing from #1007) about choosing Flavours over scheduler_hintsbased on discoverability, absence of traceability from scheduler_hints option, and based on openstack recommendation linkNote in RM that compute flavour is parked, but don't remove it from the Reference Model entirely as we are re-adding it soon.Core
None at this timeOps
None at this timeComp
None at this time