Anuket Project

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Date

 

Attendees

Absent

Non TSC Attendees

  • TBD

Agenda items

TimeItemPresenterNotes
5 min

Meeting Logistics

Former user (Deleted)
5 min

Announcements

RI-2 workstream proposing a project in OPNFV. Next steps: proposal (link shown to the L), open comment period, vote at TSC  

10 min

OPNFV Release Process

  • Status up and any follow up discussion
    • Vote & Poll: TSC Approval of the 2020 Release Plan - Vote/Poll Link
    • Marketing messages process updates from last weeks discussion
    • Using Release meeting time slot to discuss the Release PROCESS - key stakeholders should join


10 min

CNTT Engagement status updates

  • CNTT Future Mode of Operation - deadline is September, in time to make a recommendation to the Governance Board.

Scot Steele to provide feedback from LFN GB meeting

10 min

CNTT Engagement  – Future Work Items

  • OPNFV 2.0 Actions: Work Progress Page and Agreements Capture Page
    • CNTT in OPNFV status update - Qiao Fu
    • Do we still need this TSC agenda item?
  • TSC Review of Staffing Proposal to CNTT plus Field Trial Testing Plan and Staffing

    • CNTT discussions? other updates??
    • Do we still need this TSC agenda item?
  • Reference Infrastructure and Reference Conformance work with CNTT
    • Beyond CNTT's Terms of Reference (Scope), license issue is not a big risk for the amount of code in CNTT docs.
    • Do we still need this TSC agenda item?
  • Review OPNFV's overall process to respond to CNTT Requirements
    • CNTT Requirements have been revised - Release was
    • Need revised assessment of Requirements Review (CIRV coverage status (April 24))
    • Do we still need this TSC agenda item?
  • CIRV Mandate Review

    • Mark Beierl has looked at the Common Infrastructure Realization & Validation (CIRV) Home page and its mandate and believes that there is a disconnect between what the project started out doing and what it is currently doing.
    • TSC agreed there is as an opportunity to improve  
    • On Weekly Tech Discussion Agenda
    • Status update on this agenda topic
  • OPNFV 2.0 on hold during CNTT FMO discussion
  • No update on staffing proposal
  • Field test - Orange is doing test (is good)
  • RI/RC conformance - no update
  • CNTT Requirements - engagement based on test cases
  • CIRV mandate review - can drop?
    • Yes, there does not appear to be any interest in CIRV so we can remove this from the agenda.


2 min

OVP Engagement status update

  • Discuss current status - how is this impacting OPNFV?
Jim Baker
2 min

OPNFV Project Reviews

  • Projects:
    • ovn4nvf at future meeting


10 min

Status Updates


5 min

Future Topics

  • Future Topic: new template for staffing task & requirement evaluation - similar to Intern projects Mark Beierl
  • Future Topic: Yardstick's future??  HA test cases.  Bottlenecks' Stress test spawns VMs till it breaks in OVP
  • Future topic: XTesting as a project - graduation or formalization of it. We don't want it to be similar to the Test DB where we lost maintainers

  • new template concept is on hold while release process is being discussed

Outstanding Action Items

DescriptionAssigneeAssigned DateNotes

 


  • Cedric Ollivier shared an issues of shared artifacts between ONAP, OPNFV, other LFN projects

 

Needs to evolve into a CI toolchain discussion for LFN wide use
  • Kanag to discuss resource description with Al Morton for Dovetail X-testing

 






Minutes

Meeting Logistics

Announcements

  • Election
    • Single chair nomination, election will proceed.  Jim Bakerwill start the election
  • New project proposal
    • Call for interested parties to participate, enter name into proposal draft wiki page
    • Will be discussed further in the vDTF

OPNFV Release Process

  • Lots of discussion, no notes captured.


  • No labels