| 5 min | | |
|
| 2 min | |
|
|
| 5 min | |
| |
| | |
|
| 10 min | | |
|
| 5 min | - Merger of RC1 into RA1
- RC1 is maintained as a subchapter of RA1 and has the same PTL
- Vote: TSC agrees to merge the RC1 sub-project to the RA1 sub-project
| |
|
| 5 min | - Separate repo and readthedocs or one repo and readthedocs
- Let's split the repos. Long description here
- Vote: TSC agrees to separate sub-projects to separate repos (rm, ra1, ra2, ri1, ri2 and rc2)
| |
|
| 10 min | - Walter as the board representative
- My plan is to create a cross LFN wiki site to collect information, suggestions, feedback from the projects, as well as to convey the Board related and appropriate information to the project committers.
- My suggestion would be to have a regular (say once in a quarter or at least 6 months) an open Board meeting (like we did for AI).
- I think, we will need to raise a proposal for the Board to assist in seeking more resources and other (what?) support for the LFN activities.
- In my view, Board could influence LFN bodies to help in better marketing the projects and the committers’ efforts. Any good ideas how?
- Perhaps IT support issues if we think that they should be improved.
| |
|
| 5 min | | Sandra Jackson |
|
| 1 min | | |
|
| 2 min | - Moving LaaS repos to GitHub
- The LaaS team would like to move their repos away from GitLab
Separate repo and readthedocs or one repo and readthedocs
- Separate repos – multiple readthedocs
- Possibility to have separate builds. A bit more isolation of errors (e.g: a broken link in RA2 will not break the build of RM)
- Cedric already did the repo separation
- Lots of GitHub repos to manage
- Lots of Readthedocs projects to manage
- GitHub actions need to be rewritten and reconfigured in all the repos
- Difficult to implement any theme changes
- One repo – one readthedocs
- One GitHub repo and one Readthedocs to manage
- Same look and feel of all the specs
Needs a little bit of editing in the main index.rst- There is an LaaS repo mirrored to the OPNFV GitHub org, but active development should be done in the anuket-project organisation
| | 5 min | | |
|
| 5 min | - Value of Anuket / Anuket Task force (https://wiki.anuket.io/x/CgBWAw)
- A very subjective project health assessment
- Kubref - Ask Dan Xu about status. Generally has not been actively been worked on for months
- Barometer - There is no PTL
- Vineperf - Probably there is no PTL
- Thoth – PTL (Rohit Singh Rathaur )
- A: Beth Cohen will work with the AI taskforce to move Thoth to the AI project.
- RM - active, but heavily relies on Walter Kozlowski as a PTL, who is doing the work to move to GSMA docs repository and updates to add new technology
- RA1 - mature, only doc theme related changed in Orinoco
- RI1 - mature, only doc theme related changed in Orinoco
- RC1 - practically merged to RA1, no changes in Orinoco
- RA2 - Active, but limited on resources (3 active contributors)
- RI2 - Active, but limited on resources
- RC2 - Cedric Ollivier is now PTL and re-activated. 1 active contributor
- Functest, functest-kubernetes - active, relies on Cedric Ollivier alone
- Discuss in TSC
- Should we archive the inactive projects? We need to synch with the project contributors on this.
- Discuss Vineperf and Thoth status
- Focus resources on RM, R*2 and functest*
| |
|
| 2 min | | Gergely Csatari , Beth Cohen |
|
| 2 min | | |
|
| 5 min | - Technical Officer Updates
|
|
|
| 1 min | AOB | Beth Cohen |
|