Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Al Morton

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Al Morton

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

Image Removed 

Attendees

  • Move up from absent as needed.

Absent

Absent

...

5 min

Admin

Al Morton

5 10 min

Virtual Event Planning (June 1-4)

Al Morton

Jim Baker

We continue will quickly brainstorm topics.

Continue to brain-storm virtual event formats

5 min
  • Review Code of Conduct   
Heather Kirksey
From future agenda item list
1 min

OPNFV Linux Foundation Lab (Portland) hardware upgrade - Proposal yet?

  • LF POD 3 status - Confirmed motherboard failure. Funds available for mitigation, investigate.
  • Meeting minutes from the Infra Work Group

Former user (Deleted)

Trevor Bramwell

Former user (Deleted) 

Proposal next week
1 min

OPNFV 2.0 Actions:   Work Progress Page   Agreements Capture Page

  • Recap
of session at virtual conferenceShare
  • of  Governing Board meeting feedback  Al Morton and others
    • Mission OK, see RI & RC discussion
  •  Share any decisions and TSC to agree on plan
Qiao Fu
  • What's next?Mission statement is a good start, and we need a transformation in how we operate
1 min

Review OPNFV's overall process to respond to CNTT Requirements

Al Morton

  • Reports of CNTT hearing our message are true! Clarifications are coming...???
 1 min

TSC Review of Staffing Proposal to CNTT plus Field Trial Testing Plan and Staffing

  • CNTT dicussions? other updates??
  • Input from OPNFV New Release Process meeting (virtual event,  ) 
    • Release plans can use template of project work items, duration and skills needed.
    • Negotiate between projects and requirement stakeholders - TSC facilitates

Al Morton

  • Testing is an ongoing process.
  • Dates of Field Trial?
15 min

Reference Infrastructure and Reference Conformance work

  • Beyond CNTT's Terms of Reference (Scope)
  • Discuss OPNFV Adoption Process
15 min

What does OPNFV WANT from the next Release?  

Mark Beierl

David McBride


Capture IMPROVEMENTS to proposed process

Using Release meeting time slot to discuss opnfv docs evolution further (this month/April).

Image Added

5 min

CIRV Mandate Review

Mark Beierl
  •  
  • On  Weekly Tech Discussion Agenda  .

Former user (Deleted) PTL

12

, will be absent.

Former user (Deleted) Al Morton

Results from Weekly Tech Discussion:
5 min

What does OPNFV WANT from the next Release?  

David McBride

Capture IMPROVEMENTS to proposed process

Using Release meeting time slot to discuss opnfv docs evolution further (this month/April).

10 min

OPNFV Project Reviews

  • Dovetail - Kanag   
  • Request for other project reviews:  SampleVNF, releng, yardstick, ovn4nvf, pharos, container4nfv, bottlenecks, clover, rocket, edgecloud

Jim Baker

The ones listed are active but have not volunteered for review. 

The listed projects will be targeted for archival/termination if reviews are not complete by end of June 2020.

1min

Quick updates & email updates - discussion only if needed


  • Wiki was rebooted between 0700-0800 PDT to address performance issues noticed by many.

...

Task report
spacesmeetings
pageSize10
labelstsc-meeting

Minutes

Code of Conduct Review

  • Reviewed (smile)  

June Event

  • Jack Morgan will help out - his focus is to help align CNTT/OPNFV work

OPNFV Linux Foundation Lab Upgrade

  • No proposal, budget review at this time (WIP)
  • Getting quote for new equipment in UNH-IOL
  • Possibility of moving from LF to Oregon State University lab

OPNFV 2.0 Actions

  • Governing board was ok with the mission
  • No meeting last week and Fu Qiao is not able to provide an update - Discussed June event planning instead during the time slot

Review OPNFV's overall process to respond to CNTT Requirements

  • Jim shared the diagram that was shared in the TAC and that it is discussed at that level
  • The opinion is that CNTT is operating beyond its mandate (working on implementation instead of specification)
  • Some thought that the process is working OK as it is.

TSC Review of Staffing Proposal to CNTT plus Field Trial Testing Plan and Staffing

  • Field trial still planned but don't have enough volunteers yet

Reference Infrastructure and Reference Conformance work

  • Need alignment on where IP work gets done.  CNTT's licensing in not currently appropriate for the RI/RC work that is being published in GitHub.

CIRV Mandate Review

  • we had a lengthy discussion in weekly technical discuss meeting and will continue next week - meeting minutes have been published.
  • Fu Qiao shared some history/background to CIRV and the shared meeting time with RI/RC
  • Need further discussion to focus and align CIRV's role with current plans to support CNTT requirements with automated testing

What does OPNFV WANT from the next Release

  • This is currently being discussed in the Release meeting

OPNFV Project Reviews (Dovetail)

  • there is only a few active committers, last supporting release is Hunter, plans to support Iruya(?)
  • Kanagaraj shared his slides
  • One change to Dovetail is to get their test list from the X-testing zip file - need resource to implement -

Anything else?

  • Cedric shared an issues of shared artifacts between ONAP, OPNFV, other LFN projects
  • Trevor Bramwell will follow up with a ticket to investigate
  • There is also an LFN Infrastructure work group that meets to discuss these sort of topics - Trevor Bramwell is the OPNFV representative

Action items

  •  Cedric shared an issues of shared artifacts between ONAP, OPNFV, other LFN projects  Trevor Bramwell will follow up with a ticket to investigate
  •  Kanag to discuss resource description with Al Morton for Dovetail X-testing