Versions Compared

Old Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Jim Baker

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Al Morton

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

 

Attendees

  • Move up from absent as needed.

Absent

Absent

...

5 min

Admin

Al Morton

5 10 min

Virtual Event Planning (June 1-4)

Al Morton

Jim Baker

We continue will quickly brainstorm topics.

Continue to brain-storm virtual event formats

5 min
  • Review Code of Conduct   
Heather Kirksey
From future agenda item list
1 min

OPNFV Linux Foundation Lab (Portland) hardware upgrade - Proposal yet?

  • LF POD 3 status - Confirmed motherboard failure. Funds available for mitigation, investigate.
  • Meeting minutes from the Infra Work Group

Former user (Deleted)

Trevor Bramwell

Former user (Deleted) 

5 Proposal next week
1 min

OPNFV 2.0 Actions:   Work Progress Page   Agreements Capture Page

  • Recap of  Governing Board meeting feedback  Al Morton and othersShare
    • Mission OK, see RI & RC discussion
  •  Share any decisions and TSC to agree on plan
Qiao Fu
  • What's next?Mission statement is a good start, and we need a transformation in how we operate
1 min

Review OPNFV's overall process to respond to CNTT Requirements

Al Morton

  • Reports of CNTT hearing our message are true! Clarifications ???
 1 min

TSC Review of Staffing Proposal to CNTT plus Field Trial Testing Plan and Staffing

  • CNTT dicussions? other updates??
  • Input from OPNFV New Release Process meeting (virtual event,  ) 
    • Release plans can use template of project work items, duration and skills needed.
    • Negotiate between projects and requirement stakeholders - TSC facilitates

Al Morton

  • Testing is an ongoing process.
  • Dates of Field Trial?
15 min

Reference Infrastructure and Reference Conformance work

  • Beyond CNTT's Terms of Reference (Scope)
  • Discuss OPNFV Adoption Process

5 min

CIRV Mandate Review

  • Mark Beierl has looked at the Common Infrastructure Realization & Validation (CIRV) Home page and its mandate and believes that there is a disconnect between what the project started out doing and what it is currently doing.
  • Does anyone else in the TSC see this TSC agreed there is as an opportunity to improve ?  
  • On  Weekly Tech Discussion Agenda  .

Former user (Deleted) PTL, will be absent.

Former user (Deleted) Al Morton

Results from Weekly Tech Discussion:
5 min

What does OPNFV WANT from the next Release?  

David McBride

Capture IMPROVEMENTS to proposed process

Using Release meeting time slot to discuss opnfv docs evolution further (this month/April).

10 min

OPNFV Project Reviews

  • Dovetail - Kanag   
  • Request for other project reviews:  SampleVNF, releng, yardstick, ovn4nvf, pharos, container4nfv, bottlenecks, clover, rocket, edgecloud

Jim Baker

The ones listed are active but have not volunteered for review. 

The listed projects will be targeted for archival/termination if reviews are not complete by end of June 2020.

1min

Quick updates & email updates - discussion only if needed


  • Wiki was rebooted between 0700-0800 PDT to address performance issues noticed by many.

...

Task report
spacesmeetings
pageSize10
labelstsc-meeting

Minutes

Code of Conduct Review

  • Reviewed (smile)  

June Event

  • Jack Morgan will help out - his focus is to help align CNTT/OPNFV work

OPNFV Linux Foundation Lab Upgrade

  • No proposal, budget review at this time (WIP)
  • Getting quote for new equipment in UNH-IOL
  • Possibility of moving from LF to Oregon State University lab

OPNFV 2.0 Actions

  • Governing board was ok with the mission
  • No meeting last week and Fu Qiao is not able to provide an update - Discussed June event planning instead during the time slot

Review OPNFV's overall process to respond to CNTT Requirements

  • Jim shared the diagram that was shared in the TAC and that it is discussed at that level
  • The opinion is that CNTT is operating beyond its mandate (working on implementation instead of specification)
  • Some thought that the process is working OK as it is.

TSC Review of Staffing Proposal to CNTT plus Field Trial Testing Plan and Staffing

  • Field trial still planned but don't have enough volunteers yet

Reference Infrastructure and Reference Conformance work

  • Need alignment on where IP work gets done.  CNTT's licensing in not currently appropriate for the RI/RC work that is being published in GitHub.

CIRV Mandate Review

  • we had a lengthy discussion in weekly technical discuss meeting and will continue next week - meeting minutes have been published.
  • Fu Qiao shared some history/background to CIRV and the shared meeting time with RI/RC
  • Need further discussion to focus and align CIRV's role with current plans to support CNTT requirements with automated testing

What does OPNFV WANT from the next Release

  • This is currently being discussed in the Release meeting

OPNFV Project Reviews (Dovetail)

  • there is only a few active committers, last supporting release is Hunter, plans to support Iruya(?)
  • Kanagaraj shared his slides
  • One change to Dovetail is to get their test list from the X-testing zip file - need resource to implement -

Anything else?

  • Cedric shared an issues of shared artifacts between ONAP, OPNFV, other LFN projects
  • Trevor Bramwell will follow up with a ticket to investigate
  • There is also an LFN Infrastructure work group that meets to discuss these sort of topics - Trevor Bramwell is the OPNFV representative

Action items

  •  Cedric shared an issues of shared artifacts between ONAP, OPNFV, other LFN projects  Trevor Bramwell will follow up with a ticket to investigate
  •  Kanag to discuss resource description with Al Morton for Dovetail X-testing