Anuket Project

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 16 Next »

Attendees 

  1. Scot Steele(Microsoft)
  2. Scot Steele as proxy for Pankaj.Goyal
  3. Al Morton  (AT&T)
  4. Emma Foley (Red Hat)
  5. Gergely Csatari (Nokia, Co-Chair)
  6. Beth Cohen (Verizon, Co-Chair)
  7. jie niu (China Mobile)
  8. Cédric Ollivier (Orange)
  9. Karine Sevilla(Orange)
  10. Trevor Cooper (Intel)
  11. Georg Kunz (Ericsson) – Rihab Bandaywill be proxy
  12. Lincoln Lavoie  (UNH-IOL)
  13. Gergely Csatari (Vodafone)

Absent (TSC)

  1. Ulrich Kleber (Huawei)  

Other Attendees 

Agenda

Time

Topic

Presenters

Notes

5 min
  • We have quorum
  • Last week minutes are approved
2 min

Announcements

  • Events
  • CVC Chair elections
    • Ballots were sent out yesterday
    • More representation is needed to CVC from Anuket
2 min
  • Nomination period is open until  
10 min


2 min
  • Archiving Airship installer
5 min
  • TAC Member Makeup - The group agreed to adopt two of the new proposals for expanding the makeup of the TAC to include the two appointed positions as well as the Gov. Board committer at large. The LFN Platinum membership seats were discussed at length and the general thought / outcome was to not change those seats, but to administratively stop tracking the seats that are not participating. This aligns with the Quorum requirements, which are adopted from the LFN documentation and are a function of participation in the previous two meetings. The LF staffing would also continue to reach out to those members to get the "right" person appointed and participating in the TAC, since that is the end goal.


  • Release Management - Second larger discussion was on release management, and what requirements should be on projects within LFN. Some projects, like Anuket and ONAP have LF staff leading release management, other projects do not have that level of support or even that same approach to release management. There were no final decisions made on the recommendations or changes. In general, there was an agreement that projects should have some "process" documented and have demonstrated a success in following that process for "a few" releases, and that could be applied towards projects moving up from incubation, but again, no decisions finalized, this will be discussed more at the next meeting. David has slides, which should be attached to the minutes [1] (hopefully).

5 min
Release Updates
  • Moselle 
  • Release name suggestions are needed
5 min

2 min
  • CCC updates
  • Docs Project: revamp and develop a consistent place and process to manage documentation.  Discuss DTL Session plan
  • Review of CLA legal text and get sign off from participating companies
    • In the TSC meeting 26.04.2022 TSC representatives should indicate if they have questions or comments to the proposed CLA text.

2 min 
  • Marketing Update



2 min
  • PTL and WSL Stand-up

Sub-project Leaders


5 min


1 minAOB

No 

Minutes

Meeting Administration


Outstanding Action Items

  • No labels