Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 3
Next »
Attendees
-
Absent (TSC)
- Dan Xu (Huawei)
- Walter.kozlowski (Telstra) proxy by Beth Cohen
- Beth Cohen (Verizon)
- Riccardo Gasparetto Stori (Vodafone)
- guanyu zhu (Huawei)
- Gergely Csatari (Nokia) - co-chair
- Georg Kunz (Ericsson)
- Lincoln Lavoie (UNH-IOL)
Other Attendees
Agenda
Time | Topic | Presenters | Notes (if you have comments prior to the meeting add them to this column with your name as the source of the comment) |
---|
5 min | | |
|
2 min | |
| |
5 min | - Pieman
- A: Gergely Csatari to remove release string creation in GitHub for M0 from the release process template
- Uh-oh we do not have a release process template, we always copy the last release-s page. I leave a note in the Pieman page.
- A: Gergely Csatari to send a remainder for the non-specification project PTL-s
- A: Gergely Csatari to send a remainder for the specification project PTL-s
|
|
|
| | |
|
5 min | |
Sandra Jackson (Deactivated) |
- LF (Jeff S.) was working on the restructuring of the pricing for license scanning
- We should indicate the number of repos we would like to scan and how often we would like to scan them
|
10 min | - Walter as the board representative
- My plan is to create a cross LFN wiki site to collect information, suggestions, feedback from the projects, as well as to convey the Board related and appropriate information to the project committers.
- My suggestion would be to have a regular (say once in a quarter or at least 6 months) an open Board meeting (like we did for AI).
- I think, we will need to raise a proposal for the Board to assist in seeking more resources and other (what?) support for the LFN activities.
- In my view, Board could influence LFN bodies to help in better marketing the projects and the committers’ efforts. Any good ideas how?
- Perhaps IT support issues if we think that they should be improved.
| |
|
5 min | - https://build.opnfv.org/ is down
- The Orange build server is permanent and it is the build server for functest, barometer, NFV bench, vineperf opnvdocs and the anuket-specs
- The LFN build server is still needed to provide redundancy for critical jobs
- A: Fabio Palumbo (Deactivated) will clarify with Cédric Ollivier the status of the temporary build server managed by Orange
| Sandra Jackson |
|
1 min | | |
|
5 min | - Value of Anuket / Anuket Task force (https://wiki.anuket.io/x/CgBWAw)
- A very subjective project health assessment
- Kubref - Ask Dan Xu about status. Generally has not been actively been worked on for months
- Barometer - There is no PTL
- Vineperf - Probably there is no PTL
- Thoth – PTL (Rohit Singh Rathaur )
- A: Beth Cohen will work with the AI taskforce to move Thoth to the AI project.
- RM - active, but heavily relies on Walter Kozlowski as a PTL, who is doing the work to move to GSMA docs repository and updates to add new technology
- RA1 - mature, only doc theme related changed in Orinoco
- RI1 - mature, only doc theme related changed in Orinoco
- RC1 - practically merged to RA1, no changes in Orinoco
- RA2 - Active, but limited on resources (3 active contributors)
- RI2 - Active, but limited on resources
- RC2 - Cedric Ollivier is now PTL and re-activated. 1 active contributor
- Functest, functest-kubernetes - active, relies on Cedric Ollivier alone
- Discuss in TSC
- Should we archive the inactive projects? We need to synch with the project contributors on this.
- Discuss Vineperf and Thoth status
- Focus resources on RM, R*2 and functest*
| |
|
1 min | - Anuket logo in the anuket-project GitHub org
| |
|
2 min | | Gergely Csatari , Beth Cohen |
|
2 min | | |
|
5 min | - Technical Officer Updates
|
|
|
1 min | AOB | Beth Cohen | |