RC1 is maintained as a subchapter of RA1 and has the same PTL
Cédric Ollivier , the PTL of both RA1 and RC1 is okay wit the merger
Vote: TSC agrees to merge the RC1 sub-project to the RA1 sub-project
Vote: TSC agrees to merge the RC1 sub-project to the RA1 sub-project
+1: 5 / 0: 0 / -1: 0
Voted, RC1 is now part of RA1
5 min
Separate repo and readthedocs or one repo and readthedocs
To guarantee that the docs are consistent the proposed process is that the TSC appoints “doc volunteers” who get committer rights to the sub-project repos. In case of a pr is stalling related to the look and feel of the repos with the approval of the TSC they can merge it without fulfilling the branch protection rules.
My plan is to create a cross LFN wiki site to collect information, suggestions, feedback from the projects, as well as to convey the Board related and appropriate information to the project committers.
My suggestion would be to have a regular (say once in a quarter or at least 6 months) an open Board meeting (like we did for AI).
I think, we will need to raise a proposal for the Board to assist in seeking more resources and other (what?) support for the LFN activities.
In my view, Board could influence LFN bodies to help in better marketing the projects and the committers’ efforts. Any good ideas how?
Perhaps IT support issues if we think that they should be improved.