Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
Attendees
Sridhar Rao
Al Morton
Daniele Zulberti
Federica Paganelli
Sl. No | Topic | Presenters | Notes |
---|
1 | Development Update |
| Epic-VINEPERF-672:Create Tools as part of moselle release Epic-VINEPERF-671:Add support for newer software versions Epic-VINEPERF-670:Create clean workflows for Baremetal, Openstack and Kubernetes Usecases Epic-VINEPERF-669:Improve Stability for moselle Release Epic-VINEPERF-652:Enhance XTesting-ViNePerf Integration Task-VINEPERF-658:Enhance framework for XTesting-K8s Usecase Task-VINEPERF-654:XTesting-ViNePerf Integration Enhancement - Kubernetes Task-VINEPERF-653:XTesting-ViNePerf Enhancement - Openstack Epic-VINEPERF-638:Dataplane performance testing for various internal (within cloud) scenarios Task-VINEPERF-643:Pod-Pod Communication Daniele Zulberti to submit patch - reference deployment and config files (pod/nad), prox&trex. |
2. | Discussion of the results |
| Summary : - VPP performs better than OVS.
- Prox performs better than T-Rex
- Bi-Directional Prox is more inconsistent (throughput) than unidirectional
- Trex results are not consistent.
- Increasing hops, even with single node, affects the performance. Better summary for varying topologies
- Prox has some limitations - mainly w.r.t core assignments - which affects the performance.
|
3. | Limitation of L3 |
| Any of these two (red and green) paths even possible without manually adding routes/flows? Using IP-address is easy with iperf/netperf. Whereas, a Tgen (Prox/Trex), with DPDK-interfaces, it gets difficult. Not sure if our IPAM configurations are correct - Working on finding the right configuration (if any). How Userspace CNI handles IPAM configuration is not clear - with VPP, we didn't see any routes getting added. Reach out to Luc/Yuri - to check if they have achieved this with Prox. Maybe, Prox-L3swap mode can respond to ARPs. https://doc.dpdk.org/api/examples_2bond_2main_8c-example.html |