Anuket Project

Community Feedback


Please add feedback related to LFN IT. 

Please describe your feedback as you would like to present it to TAC in "Feedback description" column. 

Any Anuket specifics or internal comments for the Anuket TSC level discussion please add to  the column "Further comments".

This feedback will be consolidated and presented to the Technology Advisory Council (TAC).  

Due date:  

DateFeedback reporterFeedback descriptionFurther comments
2021/09/14

TAC recommended GitlabCI/CD to promote self managed projects

But how would we manage any project if we are not allowed to do so?

At least PTL must be promoted as Gitlab CI/CD maintainer (e.g. to connect runners)

Today's Gerrit+Jenkins is more self managed than the current GitLab CI/CD setup
2021/09/14

Anuket Jenkins was mostly down for a month which conflicts with the quality for software in production (see Functest)

Why wouldn't we promote "super" contributor to fix the common build server? especially when the fix is trivial...

It's not about accountability as everybody can do much damage if falsy "rm -rf" in jjb
2021/09/14

We wished that a fix written in SLAC and by email were applied to RELENG.

It's false that the community was blocked before weeks for a missing ticket.

What about the project management if the LFN internal tracking is SO mandatory?