Anuket Project

2021-03-10 - [Anuket Reference Model Workstream] Agenda and Meeting Minutes

Zoom link:

https://zoom.us/j/997256543?pwd=MWptM0F0Y1NpckhFVUgrZnM2TkJ0Zz09

Attendees

Please add your name in here:

Agenda:

    • Agenda 
      • Agenda bashing
        • OITF#6 meeting held on 10 march, joined by FASG group, Karine Sevillaran a joint session on security collaboration
      • Updates from Work Groups
        • WG1 XGVela collaboration: Pankaj: Pankaj.GoyalPetar Torre (Deactivated)and Gergely Csatarivolunteered to participate in the joint survey for general PaaS, waiting for XGVela team to participate
        • WG2 Acceleration: PetarWalter.kozlowskito reach out to Petar Torre (Deactivated)for an update
        • WG3 Storage: Beth: Beth Cohenlooking for a co-host of this work group
        • WG4 K8s multi-networking and load balancing: Per: presentation to RM on "Network semantics" on Feb 24 (25 minutes); In 3 weeks another presentation on K8s Networking (March 24)
        • WG5 ORAN collaboration: Tomas: Sukhdev, Pankaj, Karine, Toshi, Tom, Arkady and optional Walter,  meeting was held, next step: improving documentation in slide pack for the review in this group and bring it to RM
      • Kumar Suman: [RM Ch03] Update Service Function Chaining 3.5.1 #2276
      • Review RM Issues for closure or next release (date of the next release to be defined)
        Issue NoStatusDescriptionAssigneeDiscussion
        1720Backlog

        [RM Ch05] backwards& Forward compatibility #1720

        Walter.kozlowski : after careful consideration I think the current text and its placement in 4.2 is correct as it relates to the cloud infrastructure profiles and flavours, that are defined in 4.2 before the text on backwards compatibility.  We will need rename CNTT to Anuket as in other places. Agreed: Walter.kozlowski to create an Issue to add the general compatibility contents to Introduction, CLOSE, checked with Ahmed El Sawaf and CLOSED

        1876New

        [RM] Add new requirement to address networking scale

        Address scale for multi-site networking:

        Pankaj.Goyal: discussed in RA-1, Riccardo Gasparetto: not currently in RA-2, orchestration issues

        Sukhdev Kapur please document the ask, PR as a gap to Chapter 10

        2056Backlog

        [RM Ch03, Ch04 & Ch05] Storage: enhance content #2056

        Walter.kozlowski: Proposal: reassign to WG3 and to Beth Cohen. RM needs a plan what WG3 can deliver for the Anuket "K release (June 2021); after that we can replace this Issue by more specific issues and close 2056

        2067Backlog

        [RM Ch2.2] Review use-cases that are used for the analysis

        Walter.kozlowski: this is a very generic issue raised by Tom Kivlin, who moved on form his RA-2 role.  Proposal: take is a topic for the next RM meeting agenda, CLOSE 2067, and if needed raise specific Issues to add new or update existing Use Cases. CLOSED

        2068New

        [RM Ch2] Review analysis and whether the documented cloud infrastructure profiles need modifying/adding to

        None

        Walter.kozlowski: similar in a sense to 2067, raised by Tom Kivlin, who moved on form his RA-2 role.  Proposal: discuss with RA-1 Pankaj.Goyal and RA-2 Riccardo Gasparetto to request what they need from RM in this area.  If any action needed, replace 2068 by specific Issues/PRs, otherwise CLOSE.

        Riccardo Gasparetto :Assigned 2068 to myself, will generate a proposal for discussion 

        2087New

        [RM Chxx] Automation (closed loop automation)

        Walter.kozlowski: the issue raised by Walter.kozlowski to discuss at RM.  Proposal: put this as an agenda item for RM meeting, identify what is needed and what cna be done for "K" release, and then replace 2087 by specific Issues, and then CLOSE generic 2087

        2135New

        [RM Ch03] Illogical sub chapter order

        Walter.kozlowski: there seems to be an agreement how to reorder, any additional comments please do in https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/2135. Proposal: Walter.kozlowski and Tomas Fredberg [Ericsson] split up work between them, raise PRs and start working on them

        2265New

        [RM] Need a profile or flavor for memory intensive applications

        None

        Walter.kozlowski: there seem to be an agreement between Pankaj.Goyal, Beth Cohen Karine Sevilla Rodrigues, João (Nokia)

        on what needs to be done but it is unclear what needs to be done in RM vs RA-1 and RA-2. Proposal: identify actions in RM meeting and re-edit this Issue for RM (alternatively close if no action on RM) and/or add issues on RA- 1 and RA-2.

        2276New

        [RM Ch03] Update Service Function Chaining 3.5.1

        kumar.suman

        Walter.kozlowski : this is really new issue (raised 3 days ago and it is currently under review. Agreed: kumar.sumanto create three PRs and work on contents











        Any new issues to be raised in relation to the work currently planned or in progress in work groups, or otherwise? Please add to the table above.

    • Actions:

      • Gaps 10.3.4 (Hardware acceleration)  and 10.3.5 (Multi-cloud architecture) to be CLOSED and removed; action on Walter.kozlowski Done
      • All: Provide input into Issue discussion in above table
      • Walter.kozlowski include Use Case review into the next RM Meeting, Proposed to defer to the next RM meeting
      • All: Memory optimisation: created an issue on memory intensive profile or flavour for comments from the Team
    • Minutes: