Anuket Weekly Technical Discussions - 2021.02.08

Anuket Project

Anuket Weekly Technical Discussions - 2021.02.08

Participants

Please add your name to the list

  • @Gergely Csatari

  • @Al Morton

  • @Walter.kozlowski

  • @Karine Sevilla

  • @Pankaj.Goyal

  • @Ildiko

  • @Ulrich Kleber

  • @Qiao Fu

  • @jie niu

Antitrust policies



Action item register

  • A: @Gergely Csatari  to open a discussion about the recordings on the mailing list

    • Done

  • A: @Qiao Fu  to discuss the options of in which frame PDF 2.0 work should be done (Pharos, new Anuket project, RI[12] or something else) in the TSC

    • Done

Organisation topics

Recording of the meetings

  • Let's not record the Weekly Technical Discussions

Technical topics

Discussion of PDF 2.0 - @Qiao Fu, @jie niu

  • This is mostly a management issue

  • Most easy for PDF 2.0 contributors would be to work in CIRV as it is an active project

    • Problem is that CIRV is not an installation project

  • Infra WG-s opinion should be also checked 

    • What is the status of WG-s in Anuket?

      • So far we carried them over from OPNFV

    • Jack Morgan was leading it, but he is not available now

  • At the moment the PDF 2.0 work does not have an upstream repo to collaborate

  • Usage of CRIV is also good for the visibility of the PDF 2.0 activity

  • Will we keep using https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT for the specifications?

    • So far yes

  • Diversity of PDF-s

    • Different installer teams have different PDF variants

    • We should have a common data model, but at the moment everyone have different ideas about what shold that be

  • Next steps:

    • PDF 2.0 work will be done in a subrepo under CIRV

    • CIRV needs to be re-chartered

      • Could even lead to a name change of the project

    • Circulate the PDF 2.0 template in the mailing list to get feedback from the installer projects

    • Implement RI1 related changes to the PDF 2.0 template

Discussion of comments to Anuket Charter and TSC Procedures revisions - @Gergely Csatari

  • The charter is an appendix to a set of documents, but still should be self contained

  • We are okay to define things in attachements to the charter on wiki pages, but for all of these

    • We shall define how these are changed

    • These attachements should be stored in a known place in the wiki

  • We should agree on what kind of Charter we would like to construct

    • Charter for Transition Period and Stable period

    • Charter for Transition Period only and a Charter for Stable period needs to be done separatelly



AoB

  • Volunteer to host the 2021.02.15 Weekly Technical Meeting