Anuket Project
2022-07-26 TSC Agenda and Minutes
Attendees
@Beth Cohen (Verizon, Co-Chair)
@Scot Steele(Microsoft)
@Pankaj.Goyal(Microsoft)
@Lincoln Lavoie (UNH-IOL)
@Ulrich Kleber (Huawei)
@Karine Sevilla(Orange)
@Georg Kunz (Ericsson)
@Riccardo Gasparetto Stori (Vodafone)
@Walter.kozlowski(Telstra)
@Al Morton (AT&T)
@jie niu (China Mobile)
@Trevor Cooper (Intel)
Absent (TSC)
@Cédric Ollivier (Orange)
@Emma Foley (Red Hat)
@Gergely Csatari (Nokia, Co-Chair)
Other Attendees
Agenda
Time | Topic | Presenters | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
5 min | Agenda Bashing Attendance/Quorum (11_/15) Approval of previous meeting minutes 2022-07-19 TSC Agenda and Minutes | @Beth Cohen | Add Odim to discussion per @Walter.kozlowski |
5 min |
| @Beth Cohen @Sandra Jackson | @Gergely Csatari and @Beth Cohen added one Edge topic and a general Anuket topic – reintroducing Anuket to LFN kind of thing. @Dan Xu & @Scot Steele added topic for RI2 @Scot Steele added topic for Organizational Culture impacts Pano introduced himself. Has some ideas for kickstarting marketing for Anuket |
5 min | Release Updates Nile Release Discussion: the development project patches were ready to be committed when the TSC signed-off, but commit/merge step did not happen in Releng when it should have. There are un-merged Moselle patches (example for ViNePerf). It’s the same for thoth, barometer and kuberef. None of the Moselle branches were merged. | @David McBride @Al Morton | Unmerged patches in the Moselle release that need to be completed. Patches were in place in time. Fabio needs to do the merge. @Sandra Jackson will talk to Fabio to complete the task. No updates from @David McBride |
2 min | CLA clarification | @Sandra Jackson, @Gergely Csatari | No Updates |
15 min | Scope of Anuket | @Walter.kozlowski , @Gergely Csatari | What is the scope? Are we having scope creep? Still need to better define it. CNTT was very hardware and infrastructure focused. Maybe we need to add some definitions of interfaces with applications? The RA docs have features specifying features that are currently gaps that are not implementable. Who would do that work? Should the RM include features that are not currently available. The charter supports this. The idea is to drive work back into other projects to add these features. @Walter.kozlowski ODIM project introduction. A normalized and standardized HW management system. The project reached out to Anuket to present to TSC 30 minutes for next TSC August 2 meeting. https://odim.io/ Martin Halstead Snr Distinguished Technologist, Telco Vertical Also probably want to talk to the Nephio team about what they are doing. |
1 min | License scanning (Software composition analysis) | @Sandra Jackson |
|
5 min | Leftovers from the merger
| @Gergely Csatari |
|
2 min | CCC updates Docs Project: revamp and develop a consistent place and process to manage documentation. | @Scot Steele @Beth Cohen | No updates this week. |
2 min | PTL and WSL Stand-up | Sub-project Leaders | No updates. @Riccardo Gasparetto Stori would like to make sure that RC2 and RA2 are properly in alignment. |
5 min | Technical Officer Updates Tech Editor - @Beth Cohen CNCF Tech Coordination - @Gergely Csatari ETSI NFV and MEC Tech Coordination - @Ulrich Kleber GSMA Tech Coordination - @Walter.kozlowski XGVela Tech Coordination - @Pankaj.Goyal Open Infrastructure Foundation - @Ildiko ORAN - vacancy for WG 6 MEF - @MEHMET TOY | No Updates | |
1 min | AOB |