Anuket Project

2022-02-22 TSC Agenda and Minutes

Attendees 

  1. Beth Cohen (Verizon, Co-Chair)
  2. Scot Steele(Microsoft)
  3. Ulrich Kleber (Huawei)  
  4. Emma Foley (Red Hat)
  5. Sridhar Rao  (Spirent)
  6. Pankaj.Goyal(Microsoft)
  7. Lincoln Lavoie  (UNH-IOL)
  8. Karine Sevilla(Orange)
  9. Al Morton (AT&T)
  10. Cédric Ollivier (Orange)
  11. Georg Kunz (Ericsson)
  12. jie niu (China Mobile)
  13. Olaf Renner for Gergely Csatari

Absent (TSC)

  1. Riccardo Gasparetto (Vodafone)
  2. Trevor Cooper (Intel)

Other Attendees 

  1. Ildiko(OpenInfra)
  2. Trevor Bramwell
  3. Sandra Jackson


Agenda

Time

Topic

Presenters

Notes

5 min



No changes to Agenda

Quorum met

Minutes approved

10 min

Announcements

  • June Developer Event - In-person - Porto, Portugal
  • OpenStack PTG - Virtual
  • OpenInfra Summit - In-person - Berlin, Germany
  • June 7-9
  • CNCF Telco Cloud Day - In-person (?) - Valencia, Spain


Still in person, please start planning!








CNCF Telco Cloud Day requires Registration for KubeCon. 


2 min 
  • Marketing Update


No updates


2 min
  • CCC updates
    • Docs Project: revamp and develop a consistent place and process to manage documentation.
No CCC meeting this past week. Doc Project will be covered at the VirtDTF meeting.
5 min
Release Updates

No updates this week.


2 minNo update this week.
5 min
Gergely is away, so no updates.
10 min

Texts sent to TSC for review.

Concerns exist regarding Patents and Licensing language.  

Al Morton: we probably need to provide a Diff (between original agreements for the founding OPNFV members and the current proposals) for the legal review.

Georg Kunz: Do we need a CLA? Cédric Ollivier yes this was previously discussed and agreed to. 

Cédric Ollivier CLA Managers in company should be the ones to review/Agree. 

Pankaj.Goyal: Anuket Charter: "The Anuket Project develops open reference models and architectures for cloud infrastructures, tools, and programs. Open source software developed within the project will use OSI-approved licenses, while documentation, including specifications, will use open licenses."

Georg Kunz: section 7 of Charter does refer to CLA

Beth Cohenis this holding up conversion to GitLab


Steps we should complete:

1) CLA managers for each Participating companies need to review and provide feedback

2) LFN Legal to review feedback and make modifications

3) Participating companies will agree/disagree.


Trevor Bramwell:

 Authorization from Individual Develop

OPNFV Authorization from Non-Member Developer's Employer.pdf

link to previous OPNFV Charter: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=63111956


Decision: Do we continue with current tools for Moselle?  No objections, thus motion carries.

CCC will take up driving bring this issue to a close. 


10 min
  • GitLab update 
    • EasyCLA support - Discuss LFN TAC responses to CCLA and ICLA docs
    • Pranab - ready to start on-boarding,
    • There are still some challenges to moving forward with the conversion to the new tools.  There are some objects to moving.  The decision has been postponed to be revisited in the new year by the new TSC.  Needs more discussion and consideration on how to move forward.

Feb 23, 2021 Minutes

No Updates.

Meeting tomorrow at the TAC to discuss the tool selection for projects/subprojects.


2 minSub-project Leaders

Emma Foley Barometer Meeting time has changed, see About page. Meeting is now after the TSC meeting.

Representative for the TAC may change from Beth due to Schedule issues. More next week.

5 min

  • \also be a
  • gETSI NFV Virtual meeting is running form 2/23 thru 3/4.
  • od add
1 minAOB


Minutes

Meeting Administration


Outstanding Action Items