2021-03-09 TSC Agenda and Minutes

Anuket Project

2021-03-09 TSC Agenda and Minutes

Attendees  

  1. @Walter.kozlowski (Telstra)

  2. @Al Morton (AT&T)

  3. @Georg Kunz (Ericsson)

  4. @Frank Brockners (Cisco)

  5. @Sridhar Rao  (Spirent)

  6. @Trevor Cooper (Intel)

  7. @Gergely Csatari (Nokia)

  8. @Emma Foley (Red Hat)

  9. @Qiao Fu (China Mobile)

  10. @Beth Cohen (Verizon)

  11. @Emma Foley  (as proxy for @Mark Beierl )

  12. @Lincoln Lavoie  (UNH-IOL)

  13. @Cédric Ollivier (Orange)

  14. @Riccardo Gasparetto Stori (Vodafone)

Absent (TSC)

  1. @Ahmed El Sawaf (STC)



Other Attendees 

  1. @Scot Steele (AT&T)

  2. @Jim Baker

  3. @jie niu

  4. @Pankaj.Goyal (AT&T)

  5. @Ulrich Kleber

  6. @Trevor Bramwell

  7. @William DIEGO (Orange)

  8. @Toshi Wakayama (KDDI)

  9. @Ildiko

  10. @Heather Kirksey (Deactivated)

  11. @David McBride

  12. @Phil Robb

  13. @Steve Winslow

Agenda



Time

Topic

Presenters

Minutes



Time

Topic

Presenters

Minutes



5 min

Meeting Administration

Linux Foundation Anti-trust Policy
Agenda Bashing
Attendance/Quorum (13/15)

Approval of previous meeting minutes

Co-chairs

  • Minutes of last week's meeting are APPROVED.

  • Cedric started a discussion on the meeting recording. The ask is to make the meeting recording available to the community or not to record the meeting. The current policy is to have the recording only available for a week to ensure minutes can be completed.  Note: Many public meetings are recorded for a short time to help with editing and creating minutes.
    Suggestion: If there is a need to change the recording policy, it should be brought forward as a proposal to the next TSC meeting.

@Cédric Ollivier : I asked, Feb 25 2021, the record of TSC Feb 23 2021. Still waiting for it.

@Al Morton : it appears that particular TSC meeting was not recorded.



5min

Announcements

"K" release name nominations/selection process AND  "L" release name selection poll Mar 5, 2021   Poll started and closes Mar 12, 2021  - be advised you may need to login to groups.io

@Walter.kozlowski

  • Note: Several CNTT projects (e.g. RC1) and FuncTest in association already use the "Kali" name informally (i.e., to select test cases).



15 min

Continue Release process discussions, Goals and Management

Proposed milestones (https://lf-anuket.atlassian.net/wiki/x/W_hNAQ)  UPDATE

Interaction opportunities and end-goals/customers

@David McBride

  • Concern that M3 (contents freeze) is very "early".

  • Need to clearly explain as part of the schedule that specification is working on release "n+1" whereas validation and testing is on release "n"; i.e. there is no dependency between specification work and testing/validation work.

  • Pankaj will propose some changes to the current schedule to allow for better interleaving of specification and testing/validation development work. 
    (Draft from Pankaj: https://lf-anuket.atlassian.net/wiki/x/W_hNAQ)

  • Gergely to add the topic to the agenda of the technical meeting on Monday.

    • @Gergely Csatari and @Walter.kozlowski will lead the meeting.

NOTE: Meeting times are nailed to UTC. With the US switching to DST this weekend and Europe 2 weeks later, meeting times are a bit out of synch. Gergely will propose a meeting time for the next 2 technical meetings → look for an email from Gergely. Also note that in 2 weeks time, all meetings which are nailed to UTC will be1 hour earlier than where they are right now.



15 min 

 Anuket IP (intellectual property) policies

@Heather Kirksey (Deactivated)

Steve Winslow

  • Historically, in the days of OPNFV, a CLA-like process was part of the membership agreement but not documented in the charter.

  • Once OPNFV became a project under LFN, it no longer had a separate member agreement; the OPNFV CLA-like process was used in our tooling by not formally documented in the Technical charter

  • CNTT was very light weight - just leveraging creative commons, and no CLA.

  • Several OSS projects use CLA but not all.

  • Now that we are Anuket, it would be a good idea to have consistent IP hygiene across the whole project. 

  • One option would be for all Anuket projects to leverage the Apache CLA document for contributors, both for "corporate" contributors and individual contributors.

  • Steve Winslow to write up a proposal both to explain what's being proposed and why and suggested implementation regarding suggested charter change.

  • It would be good to create a whitepaper on the topic of CLAs - why the exist, what their benefits are, what they resolve, etc.

  • Proposal to call another meeting with TSC members and their legal counsel to explain and validate way forward.  



15 min

VSPERF project name change and revise scope Future of VSPERF@Sridhar Rao
Volunteers are needed to re-juvenate and lead work areas

RI-2  @Tom Kivlin has stepped down,

ALL PTLs - identify the Lab resources you are currently using!

@Al Morton

  • VSPERF - scope evolved to incl. OpenStack, K8s, ... 
    Contributors are mostly from academia.
    Whenever VSPERF is discussed, the name leads to confusion.
    Suggested new name: "ViNePERF"

    • TSC APPROVES the name change and scope change of VSPERF.

    • VSPERF team to open a support ticket to make the required infra changes (git etc.)

  • RI-2 - suggestion is to use the next Wednesday Kuberef/RI-2 meeting to work on a solution to "distribute the work" in an appropriate way so that work continues and no balls are dropped.



10 min

Update on Weekly Technical Discussion of the Charter

@Gergely Csatari

Monday meeting on the topic concluded with looking at other recent charters as candidates for clarity.

@Pankaj.Goyal volunteered to add a first draft based on the XGVela and CNTT charters here: Anuket Charter and TSC Procedures revisions#Basedonotherprojectscharters



5 min

gitlab/gitlab CI migration

Follow-up on Questions regarding:

@Trevor Bramwell

@Jim Baker

Responses from Gitlab:



5 min

Status Updates
Linux Foundation Lab (Portland) hardware upgrade status
LF IT/Infra update: (Aric GardnerTrevor Bramwell)

@Trevor Bramwell

@ Aric Gardner

no updates this week



10 min

Technical Officers updates

Tech Editor - @Beth Cohen
CNCF Tech Coordination - @Gergely Csatari
ETSI NFV and MEC Tech Coordination - @Ulrich Kleber
GSMA Tech Coordination - @Tom Van Pelt (Deactivated)
XGVela Tech Coordination - @Pankaj.Goyal
Open Infrastructure Foundation - @Ildiko

@Walter.kozlowski

Technical Officers

Volunteers requested in TSC meeting and/or by e-mail to @Walter.kozlowski

@Ulrich Kleber : There will be an NFV workshop on April 21st, co-hosted by ETSI and TelecomTV. Details coming soon at https://www.telecomtv.com/content/events/. Call for papers is already open at https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=tWp05tzrnU6CG6cb2vY9mxzCCY34CZJNkU2yy1ExQDpUMkMyVVpZOFYzVEVSTDlKRUs1UEJTVTZMQS4u . It would be a good opportunity for Anuket to engage.

Deadlime for CFP - March 22, Open call for presentations, but Uli will reserve a slot for Anuket.  Slides come after that.

@Ildiko The next PTG will happen on April 19-23. You can find more information and the registration link here: https://www.openstack.org/ptg/

CNCF (@Gergely Csatari ):

@Pankaj.Goyal XGVela: will draft a survey of Anuket and XGVela members:

  • Survey on Telco PaaS: create a common category of SW versions, from this survey.

Other volunteers for coordination needed, see Mar 2, 2021 Minutes

@Walter.kozlowski GSMA OITF#6 on 10 March on Security within RM with people from GSMA FASG group





0 min

AOB









Future Agenda Topics:

How do we figure out who are the WS stream leads AND PTLs in an automated way? @Mark Beierl





Outstanding Action Items

Need the statement of Business value (focused on the vendor community) from the Marketing WG.
For all PTLs - identify the Lab resources you are currently using!  by Mar 2, 2021 
Anuket Recruiting:  Bob Monkman heads up the Anuket marketing group. We could invite him for a readout in 2-3 weeks from Feb 23, 2021 .