Atlassian uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, perform analytics and research, and conduct advertising. Accept all cookies to indicate that you agree to our use of cookies on your device. Atlassian cookies and tracking notice, (opens new window)
Portrayal of Reference Implementation (discussion):
Full RI comes AFTER Meld is complete? See artifact discussion
How do we characterize the JERMA Release Test Suite?
OPNFV provides the building-blocks (tests) for CNTT's RC.
Repeatable, consumable, stable.
Hand-off OPNFV-JERMA to RC activities and OVP badging (not the same)
Main goal OPNFV-JERMA is to work-out Release processes and Release testing, then hand-off to others.
More specifically, is JERMA an RC Tech Preview? Prototype? Beta? Experimental?
JERMA is the most comprehensive set of tests aligned to the CNTT RA-1 and RC-1.
NEED to follow OPNFV-JERMA Release with RC-1 Baldy, add new tests in the 'how to run the RC-1 tests' instructions (Baldy RC-1 point release is THE RC).
CNTT determines the definition of Compliance (test cases in RC).
Does the TSC agree that Jerma is a release of OPNFV project which can be consumed by CNTT to form the RC and RI?
Where does AIRSHIP stand with respect to CNTT RI ??
How is AIRSHIP Gated/evaluated as part of the JERMA Release?
Does the AIRSHIP Release Gate require RC-conformance == CNTT RI ?
Or, Is the JERMA Release of AIRSHIP self-gating?
Or, is No RI delivered in JERMA - RI not defined - AIRSHIP is an RI Technical Preview only.
FINAL JERMA RELEASE GATE:
Does the TSC agree that JERMA is a release of OPNFV projects which can be consumed to form the BALDY RC and/or RI?
or do we mean to say that OPNFV JERMA IS The RC and the RI ??